Comments on: ACK tribute in NY http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2012/01/26/ack-tribute-in-ny/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Shefali D http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2012/01/26/ack-tribute-in-ny/comment-page-1/#comment-288486 Shefali D Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:39:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/?p=8317#comment-288486 <p>Great post.enjoyed reading.. Cheers Shefali..www.findghar.com</p> Great post.enjoyed reading.. Cheers Shefali..www.findghar.com

]]>
By: A N N A http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2012/01/26/ack-tribute-in-ny/comment-page-1/#comment-288262 A N N A Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:02:15 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/?p=8317#comment-288262 <p>Is anyone picking up on the epic trollery from gompiepie? There are few, in fact no words from Pavani about women in this brief post. In truth, accusing her of constant sexist bias is a losing proposition, like every other attempt at trolling in history (it wouldn't be trolling if it were true, fair, just etc).</p> <p>Just click on her name and go through her articles. Blah blah perceived bias blah. Yadda yadda how dare she mention anyone with a vagina yadda. The last one was some propaganda about reality (it IS a man's world) dressed up as a blog post written by a dedicated volunteer who receives no renumeration but plenty of bullshit for posting. Always manages to hit "publish this post", unlike that slacker A N N A, who often starts writing a post but then throws up her hands and snaps her laptop shut, due to post traumatic stress from lameness like this. She has given up on trying to revive the golden age of SM, when commenters were witty and bloggers were pretty. Except for gay males. They were fierce. Duh. What else would teh geyz be? Why do you hate innocent bloggers, and by extension, women, troll-beta? Something we should know?</p> Is anyone picking up on the epic trollery from gompiepie? There are few, in fact no words from Pavani about women in this brief post. In truth, accusing her of constant sexist bias is a losing proposition, like every other attempt at trolling in history (it wouldn’t be trolling if it were true, fair, just etc).

Just click on her name and go through her articles. Blah blah perceived bias blah. Yadda yadda how dare she mention anyone with a vagina yadda. The last one was some propaganda about reality (it IS a man’s world) dressed up as a blog post written by a dedicated volunteer who receives no renumeration but plenty of bullshit for posting. Always manages to hit “publish this post”, unlike that slacker A N N A, who often starts writing a post but then throws up her hands and snaps her laptop shut, due to post traumatic stress from lameness like this. She has given up on trying to revive the golden age of SM, when commenters were witty and bloggers were pretty. Except for gay males. They were fierce. Duh. What else would teh geyz be? Why do you hate innocent bloggers, and by extension, women, troll-beta? Something we should know?

]]>
By: gompiepie http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2012/01/26/ack-tribute-in-ny/comment-page-1/#comment-288238 gompiepie Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:04:02 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/?p=8317#comment-288238 <p>Is anyone picking up on the constant sexist bias from Pavani? There are few ACK covers on a woman, fairly reflecting their contribution to Indian history, she goes with Rani of Jhansi. In truth, a loser like every other Hindu Queen in history (the Muslims/Brits didn't let women anywhere near power).</p> <p>Just click on her name and go through her articles. An exhibition titled "Decoding images of Maharajas" becomes "Maharajas, maharanis and more". The last one was some propaganda on how it's a man's world dressed up as something on Lahore. Always manages to work in her grandmother, mother or a full piece on a no-mark female. Except for gay males. Why do you hate heterosexual South Asian guys, and by extension children, something we should know?</p> Is anyone picking up on the constant sexist bias from Pavani? There are few ACK covers on a woman, fairly reflecting their contribution to Indian history, she goes with Rani of Jhansi. In truth, a loser like every other Hindu Queen in history (the Muslims/Brits didn’t let women anywhere near power).

Just click on her name and go through her articles. An exhibition titled “Decoding images of Maharajas” becomes “Maharajas, maharanis and more”. The last one was some propaganda on how it’s a man’s world dressed up as something on Lahore. Always manages to work in her grandmother, mother or a full piece on a no-mark female. Except for gay males. Why do you hate heterosexual South Asian guys, and by extension children, something we should know?

]]>