Comments on: The Haley bubble http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Razib Khan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285346 Razib Khan Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:23:59 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285346 <p><i>That's because Piyush isn't his middle name</i></p> <p>right. when someone makes a reasonable argument as JJ did, but can't bother to get a series of basic facts correct, that's a serious discouragement to engagement. therefore, i think i'm calling it quits while i'm ahead. not in the mood of monitoring this thread anymore</p> That’s because Piyush isn’t his middle name

right. when someone makes a reasonable argument as JJ did, but can’t bother to get a series of basic facts correct, that’s a serious discouragement to engagement. therefore, i think i’m calling it quits while i’m ahead. not in the mood of monitoring this thread anymore

]]>
By: Alina_M http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285345 Alina_M Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:06:49 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285345 <p>Sorry, I meant Nimrata, not Nikkita!</p> Sorry, I meant Nimrata, not Nikkita!

]]>
By: Alina_M http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285344 Alina_M Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:02:12 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285344 <blockquote>I also see in blog posts/comments everywhere the insistent and unnecessary insertion of their middle names Piyush and Randhawa as though to remind everyone who they truly are. There is also the use of quotes around "Bobby" as though to say "Ha ha that is not his name even though he says it is".</blockquote> <p>That's because Piyush <i>isn't</i> his middle name, it's his first name. "Bobby" was a nickname he adopted as a kid, but his legal name that appears on the ballot is Piyush Jindal. It's no more demeaning than referring to Haley as "Nikkita Haley" rather than her nickname, Nikki.</p> I also see in blog posts/comments everywhere the insistent and unnecessary insertion of their middle names Piyush and Randhawa as though to remind everyone who they truly are. There is also the use of quotes around “Bobby” as though to say “Ha ha that is not his name even though he says it is”.

That’s because Piyush isn’t his middle name, it’s his first name. “Bobby” was a nickname he adopted as a kid, but his legal name that appears on the ballot is Piyush Jindal. It’s no more demeaning than referring to Haley as “Nikkita Haley” rather than her nickname, Nikki.

]]>
By: Razib Khan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285343 Razib Khan Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:05:41 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285343 <p><i>Why is the American media and public so shallow that they will judge a politician by the way he speaks and other external attributes? Thereby ignoring all of Jindals considerable achievements and qualifications? They should learn from the Indians and<b> Chinese</b> who have no problem electing dopey leaders who put you to sleep when they talk.</i></p> <p>unless you are talking about the republic of china, the chinese don't <i>elect</i> leaders. your comments makes a fair point in terms of their substance, but speaking of style, there's an artless dullness to them which makes me uninterested in engaging. you can complain all you want about the american people and the media, but they'll stay stupid longer than you can complain.</p> Why is the American media and public so shallow that they will judge a politician by the way he speaks and other external attributes? Thereby ignoring all of Jindals considerable achievements and qualifications? They should learn from the Indians and Chinese who have no problem electing dopey leaders who put you to sleep when they talk.

unless you are talking about the republic of china, the chinese don’t elect leaders. your comments makes a fair point in terms of their substance, but speaking of style, there’s an artless dullness to them which makes me uninterested in engaging. you can complain all you want about the american people and the media, but they’ll stay stupid longer than you can complain.

]]>
By: John Jacobi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285342 John Jacobi Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:02:09 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285342 <p>"Because Desis are highly opportunistic and self loathing... we know each others tricks"</p> <p>I think both Jindal and Nikki are remarkable people who we all should be proud of. I am just a bit put off by the snide remarks on this board mainly because they changed their name or religion. The assumption without any proof whatsoever that they were purely political ploys. I also see in blog posts/comments everywhere the insistent and unnecessary insertion of their middle names Piyush and Randhawa as though to remind everyone who they truly are. There is also the use of quotes around "Bobby" as though to say "Ha ha that is not his name even though he says it is".</p> <p>"It began with an optically disastrous and widely mocked Republican response to Barack Hussein Obama’s State of the Union speech a few years back."</p> <p>Why is the American media and public so shallow that they will judge a politician by the way he speaks and other external attributes? Thereby ignoring all of Jindals considerable achievements and qualifications? They should learn from the Indians and Chinese who have no problem electing dopey leaders who put you to sleep when they talk.</p> “Because Desis are highly opportunistic and self loathing… we know each others tricks”

I think both Jindal and Nikki are remarkable people who we all should be proud of. I am just a bit put off by the snide remarks on this board mainly because they changed their name or religion. The assumption without any proof whatsoever that they were purely political ploys. I also see in blog posts/comments everywhere the insistent and unnecessary insertion of their middle names Piyush and Randhawa as though to remind everyone who they truly are. There is also the use of quotes around “Bobby” as though to say “Ha ha that is not his name even though he says it is”.

“It began with an optically disastrous and widely mocked Republican response to Barack Hussein Obama’s State of the Union speech a few years back.”

Why is the American media and public so shallow that they will judge a politician by the way he speaks and other external attributes? Thereby ignoring all of Jindals considerable achievements and qualifications? They should learn from the Indians and Chinese who have no problem electing dopey leaders who put you to sleep when they talk.

]]>
By: suresh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285341 suresh Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:32:14 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285341 <p>"Why is it that nobody seems to even consider the fact that Jindal and Nikki converted to Christianity because they wanted to and not for political reasons? "</p> <p>Because Desis are highly opportunistic and self loathing... we know each others tricks.</p> “Why is it that nobody seems to even consider the fact that Jindal and Nikki converted to Christianity because they wanted to and not for political reasons? “

Because Desis are highly opportunistic and self loathing… we know each others tricks.

]]>
By: Pravin Praveen http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285339 Pravin Praveen Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:13:25 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285339 <p>Some of us acknowledge that possibility. But this is a comments section and we go by our gut feeling. I have read excerpts of Jindal's writings on his conversion and while it seems sincere, I wonder if it is his way of convincing himself he is doing it for reasons of faith and not some way to justify in hindisght why he decided to convert. Nikki's reasons seem more for expediency but she does not go on and on about religion as much as Jindal. There are a lot of desis that convert. AR Rahman doesnt get bashed because a lot of people, even fundie Hindus, know that he did it for emotional reasons and not to fit in for advancing his career. But these are the only two under scrutiny because there is some questions on why they did it plus they are very visible in the public eye. A lot of the backlash is more than a mere checklist of desiness. I dont think Nikki Haley got even half the criticism of Bobby Jindal for the name change.Maybe because by the time Jindal got famous, for better or worse, he was seen as someone way too eager to distance himself from desiness in a calculated manner. Also Nikki is a nickname that is common in both the east and west. It also helps accept such stuff when the person is likable. I am guessing Nikki has a more likable persona than Jindal. She has an easy smile, and is decent looking. Jindal has a slight distant look and does not seem as down to earth.</p> <p>I think far more importance would be if she decided to prove her sincerity to her constituents by imposing Intelligent Design on SC schools. I know Jindal is in favor of it. I have no idea what Haley's stand is on this issue.</p> <p>I do think that Will Folks guy is a jerk regarless of the veracity of his sexual claims.Even if you were to believe everything he said about his affair with Nikki, I am guessing she called it off because it was a heat in of the moment thing and he felt jilted and is acting petty now. I thnk Nikki has certainly some aspects of her life that are admirable. She has gone against a good ole boys network even if you take into account all the politically calculated stuff she is guilty of. I think she cares about her state. Let us hope she doesn't become a Palin clone and go for the publicity thing. She is smarter and seems more sincere than Palin.</p> Some of us acknowledge that possibility. But this is a comments section and we go by our gut feeling. I have read excerpts of Jindal’s writings on his conversion and while it seems sincere, I wonder if it is his way of convincing himself he is doing it for reasons of faith and not some way to justify in hindisght why he decided to convert. Nikki’s reasons seem more for expediency but she does not go on and on about religion as much as Jindal. There are a lot of desis that convert. AR Rahman doesnt get bashed because a lot of people, even fundie Hindus, know that he did it for emotional reasons and not to fit in for advancing his career. But these are the only two under scrutiny because there is some questions on why they did it plus they are very visible in the public eye. A lot of the backlash is more than a mere checklist of desiness. I dont think Nikki Haley got even half the criticism of Bobby Jindal for the name change.Maybe because by the time Jindal got famous, for better or worse, he was seen as someone way too eager to distance himself from desiness in a calculated manner. Also Nikki is a nickname that is common in both the east and west. It also helps accept such stuff when the person is likable. I am guessing Nikki has a more likable persona than Jindal. She has an easy smile, and is decent looking. Jindal has a slight distant look and does not seem as down to earth.

I think far more importance would be if she decided to prove her sincerity to her constituents by imposing Intelligent Design on SC schools. I know Jindal is in favor of it. I have no idea what Haley’s stand is on this issue.

I do think that Will Folks guy is a jerk regarless of the veracity of his sexual claims.Even if you were to believe everything he said about his affair with Nikki, I am guessing she called it off because it was a heat in of the moment thing and he felt jilted and is acting petty now. I thnk Nikki has certainly some aspects of her life that are admirable. She has gone against a good ole boys network even if you take into account all the politically calculated stuff she is guilty of. I think she cares about her state. Let us hope she doesn’t become a Palin clone and go for the publicity thing. She is smarter and seems more sincere than Palin.

]]>
By: John Jacobi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285337 John Jacobi Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:39:11 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285337 <p>Why is it that nobody seems to even consider the fact that Jindal and Nikki converted to Christianity because they wanted to and not for political reasons?</p> Why is it that nobody seems to even consider the fact that Jindal and Nikki converted to Christianity because they wanted to and not for political reasons?

]]>
By: sellout http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285335 sellout Tue, 05 Jul 2011 09:30:58 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285335 <p>I think a difference needs to be drawn between the various types of "selling out".</p> <p>If you emigrate to another country, I think, to a certain extent, you should sell out. That is you should try and assimilate as much as possible while maintaining your religious and cultural beliefs if that is important to you. Anglicizing your name in a business context is a smart move, and as has been pointed out many of the earlier "white" immigrants have done similar things (Italians, Germans, Polish etc). You don't have to convert religion but you don't have to go around stuffing your religion in other people's faces either. It is simple common sense really. Socializing with all types of people is important, nothing wrong with eating apple pie and celebrating the fourth of july either.</p> <p>The problem with "selling out" as I see it is when you do it in your own country to the detriment of your fellow countrymen. That is a very different kind of selling out and much worse, in my opinion. I use colonialism as an example - there was so much selling out going on it was ridiculous. It was also to a power that really didn't give a monkeys about the people who were selling out to them and thought of all of them as beneath them. These powers then proceeded to loot and rob the countries dry while not giving a stuff about the people.</p> <p>That is selling out to me. As an immigrant, adopting the local culture within the bounds of what you are comfortable with is just common sense.</p> I think a difference needs to be drawn between the various types of “selling out”.

If you emigrate to another country, I think, to a certain extent, you should sell out. That is you should try and assimilate as much as possible while maintaining your religious and cultural beliefs if that is important to you. Anglicizing your name in a business context is a smart move, and as has been pointed out many of the earlier “white” immigrants have done similar things (Italians, Germans, Polish etc). You don’t have to convert religion but you don’t have to go around stuffing your religion in other people’s faces either. It is simple common sense really. Socializing with all types of people is important, nothing wrong with eating apple pie and celebrating the fourth of july either.

The problem with “selling out” as I see it is when you do it in your own country to the detriment of your fellow countrymen. That is a very different kind of selling out and much worse, in my opinion. I use colonialism as an example – there was so much selling out going on it was ridiculous. It was also to a power that really didn’t give a monkeys about the people who were selling out to them and thought of all of them as beneath them. These powers then proceeded to loot and rob the countries dry while not giving a stuff about the people.

That is selling out to me. As an immigrant, adopting the local culture within the bounds of what you are comfortable with is just common sense.

]]>
By: Sahar http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2011/07/03/the_haley_bubbl/comment-page-1/#comment-285333 Sahar Tue, 05 Jul 2011 07:18:14 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=6594#comment-285333 <p>100% agree.</p> 100% agree.

]]>