Comments on: Teacher Absenteeism in the Desh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: KolaNutTechie http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252851 KolaNutTechie Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:20:08 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252851 <p>Many of you seem to underestimate the crushing effect of bad schooling and the doors it closes on you. Indian education system is down in the gutters but India is one of the most competitive countries in the world at the secondary school level, and the competition starts right at the 10th boards. For entry into a decent B-School, which is currently the hot favorite of the brightest in the country, everything from marks in 10th upwards counts. Score below 70 in your 10th exams (or 12th) and the doors of the top 15 B-Schools close on you. For a student from an underprivileged background, it is going to be very hard to score about 70 without getting proper guidance/tutions and dedicated teachers. If your father is a rickshaw puller and your mother is a maid and you have a baby sister to attend to, its going to be very hard juggling your work with your studies. And these students do not take specialized tuition classes that the wards of elite can afford. That puts them at a permanent disadvantage, as it does not reflect well on their 'consistency' as a student and marks them for life. Intangibles like that ensure only children of the well-to-do get plush corporate jobs, even though they might be cognitively less able than the unfortunate poor child. Scholarships won't help them because to qualify for one you need to have a certain amount of time and a certain type of environment. The children of the rich can blunder and debauch and still give the GMAT because their parents have deep pockets. The children of the poor are afforded no such chance to blunder. Money and social status is gathered through a process of accretion in a nepotist, corrupt society like India. And the gap is widening because the bottom is falling deeper.</p> Many of you seem to underestimate the crushing effect of bad schooling and the doors it closes on you. Indian education system is down in the gutters but India is one of the most competitive countries in the world at the secondary school level, and the competition starts right at the 10th boards. For entry into a decent B-School, which is currently the hot favorite of the brightest in the country, everything from marks in 10th upwards counts. Score below 70 in your 10th exams (or 12th) and the doors of the top 15 B-Schools close on you. For a student from an underprivileged background, it is going to be very hard to score about 70 without getting proper guidance/tutions and dedicated teachers. If your father is a rickshaw puller and your mother is a maid and you have a baby sister to attend to, its going to be very hard juggling your work with your studies. And these students do not take specialized tuition classes that the wards of elite can afford. That puts them at a permanent disadvantage, as it does not reflect well on their ‘consistency’ as a student and marks them for life. Intangibles like that ensure only children of the well-to-do get plush corporate jobs, even though they might be cognitively less able than the unfortunate poor child. Scholarships won’t help them because to qualify for one you need to have a certain amount of time and a certain type of environment. The children of the rich can blunder and debauch and still give the GMAT because their parents have deep pockets. The children of the poor are afforded no such chance to blunder. Money and social status is gathered through a process of accretion in a nepotist, corrupt society like India. And the gap is widening because the bottom is falling deeper.

]]>
By: Pravin http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252798 Pravin Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:20:21 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252798 <p>I just want to add that I approach this issue from a liberal POV. I know that makes me different from my usual political affiliation. But my goals in education are liberal - quality education for all(and if the government has to give scholarships for poor kids to attend a private school, so be it). If we can reform public school system(hasn't the public school system had many decades to prove that it can reform itself?), i am open to those ideas. While the education system is still out of reach for a lot of poor kids in India, I do think their entrepeneurial spirit has led to a quality education being accessible to lower middle class studentsin bigger numbers than if the system was merely a group of government controlled schools. I say, let the parents decide which school they want their kids go to. That is different from a system where the parents are expected to somehow reform a system in the neighborhood they live in right away for their kids to get the benefits, or put up with the tyranny of the majority even if the parent doesn't like the system. The only other option for that parent is to move to another neighborhood just based on a disagreement on education.</p> I just want to add that I approach this issue from a liberal POV. I know that makes me different from my usual political affiliation. But my goals in education are liberal – quality education for all(and if the government has to give scholarships for poor kids to attend a private school, so be it). If we can reform public school system(hasn’t the public school system had many decades to prove that it can reform itself?), i am open to those ideas. While the education system is still out of reach for a lot of poor kids in India, I do think their entrepeneurial spirit has led to a quality education being accessible to lower middle class studentsin bigger numbers than if the system was merely a group of government controlled schools. I say, let the parents decide which school they want their kids go to. That is different from a system where the parents are expected to somehow reform a system in the neighborhood they live in right away for their kids to get the benefits, or put up with the tyranny of the majority even if the parent doesn’t like the system. The only other option for that parent is to move to another neighborhood just based on a disagreement on education.

]]>
By: Pravin http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252794 Pravin Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:14:13 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252794 <p>I think the Public School system in the US is a joke. People who bash private school alternatives as elitist ignore the fact that public schools are elitist. Why else do parents spend a ridiculous amount of time choosing where they live based on the school system alone??? Why shouldn't families want to live where they want to live and still find a way to send their kids to the school of their choice? Aren't there school boards that have vested interests which are as deterimental to the "purity" of the educational process as a profit seeking entity? If they remove the monopoly of a neighborhood based public school, you will see a lot more competition for private schools that will fill the niche of a middle class education. People like Ron Clark won't need a movie to get them exposure and funding. There a lot of disillusioned public school educators who could run chains of public schools if given the opportunity to get funding via reasonable tuition fees which would come from the government as competition to public schools. I do not trust those studies which try to make some definitive conclusion that areas which have used private school alternatives via vouchers have not produced increased results. Those are such small samples.</p> I think the Public School system in the US is a joke. People who bash private school alternatives as elitist ignore the fact that public schools are elitist. Why else do parents spend a ridiculous amount of time choosing where they live based on the school system alone??? Why shouldn’t families want to live where they want to live and still find a way to send their kids to the school of their choice? Aren’t there school boards that have vested interests which are as deterimental to the “purity” of the educational process as a profit seeking entity? If they remove the monopoly of a neighborhood based public school, you will see a lot more competition for private schools that will fill the niche of a middle class education. People like Ron Clark won’t need a movie to get them exposure and funding. There a lot of disillusioned public school educators who could run chains of public schools if given the opportunity to get funding via reasonable tuition fees which would come from the government as competition to public schools. I do not trust those studies which try to make some definitive conclusion that areas which have used private school alternatives via vouchers have not produced increased results. Those are such small samples.

]]>
By: Yoga Fire http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252319 Yoga Fire Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:36:37 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252319 <blockquote>(as in actually giving it to the people, not State apparatchiks leftists so often confuse with the people).</blockquote> <p>Yea, that's about where you started to lose me.</p> <blockquote>We know nothing about what we are not shown. Would the citizens of India have tolerated it if, say, Sanjay Gandhi had lived, converted the Congress party into a kind of authoritarian fiefdom, demolished slums and sent the dwellers back to the villages, forcibly stopped migration into the cities, sterilised millions of 'non productive' citizens, crushed the independent media and suppressed religion?</blockquote> <p>It is kind of funny that the same people who rail against certain parties for being "fascist" also seem to have no problem edifying some of the most oppressive leaders around.</p> <blockquote>This is in no way condoning our weaknesses and corruption, but I don't think the situation is as bleak and hopeless as we often like to portray. Of course you can point out grinding poverty and inequalities, but I feel things are improving, and the pace will only quicken from here.</blockquote> <p>The pace happens despite India's leadership rather than because of it. While certain people with an axe to grind like to imagine caste or religious conspiracy theories, I feel the core issue is just Indian institutions being simultaneously too majoritarian and too centered on narrow patronage networks. If you're going to have an activist government, you need a strong centralized civil service without many local connections. Local connections tend to be cliquey and breed corruption. If you want to have a strongly democratic government that is responsive to the needs of people on the ground, you can't have the government be all that involved in micromanaging issues, because the more it gets involved in the more incentive there is for government to be captured by these narrow parochial interests.</p> (as in actually giving it to the people, not State apparatchiks leftists so often confuse with the people).

Yea, that’s about where you started to lose me.

We know nothing about what we are not shown. Would the citizens of India have tolerated it if, say, Sanjay Gandhi had lived, converted the Congress party into a kind of authoritarian fiefdom, demolished slums and sent the dwellers back to the villages, forcibly stopped migration into the cities, sterilised millions of ‘non productive’ citizens, crushed the independent media and suppressed religion?

It is kind of funny that the same people who rail against certain parties for being “fascist” also seem to have no problem edifying some of the most oppressive leaders around.

This is in no way condoning our weaknesses and corruption, but I don’t think the situation is as bleak and hopeless as we often like to portray. Of course you can point out grinding poverty and inequalities, but I feel things are improving, and the pace will only quicken from here.

The pace happens despite India’s leadership rather than because of it. While certain people with an axe to grind like to imagine caste or religious conspiracy theories, I feel the core issue is just Indian institutions being simultaneously too majoritarian and too centered on narrow patronage networks. If you’re going to have an activist government, you need a strong centralized civil service without many local connections. Local connections tend to be cliquey and breed corruption. If you want to have a strongly democratic government that is responsive to the needs of people on the ground, you can’t have the government be all that involved in micromanaging issues, because the more it gets involved in the more incentive there is for government to be captured by these narrow parochial interests.

]]>
By: Jonathan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252288 Jonathan Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:22:46 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252288 <p>Actual absenteeism might not be as big an issue in the US, but there is certainly an absenteeism of presence, if you will- teachers who show up but aren't really there, doing little in the way of education. Here in the American South- I don't know if it's similar in the rest of the country- the worst comes from teachers who are also coaches, who usually end up "teaching" history or something similar. Granted, there are some excellent teachers who are also coaches, but there are enough cases of simply abysmal failure to instruct that the coach-as-crappy-teacher is something of an accepted element of rural Southern society... That's just one example from my home region- I'm sure I could multiply them. For another instance, look up the recent New Yorker article on New York City public education. It made me feel rather better about the abysmal state of my native state's public education, and that's saying something.</p> <p>Also, in response to posters who have suggested that private education is somehow elitist- besides ignoring the fact that many private Indian schools are in fact quite inexpensive, they are also ignorant- willfully or otherwise- of the diversity of private education in the US. Again, I know of plenty of small private schools and education cooperatives here in the South whose students come from decidedly lower-middle class families, not the wealthy. Now, in some parts of the South there are private schools that are geared to the moderately wealthy white families, but they are almost indistinguishable from public schools. In most places the well-off white people have their own public schools, and the minority kids theirs.</p> <p>And finally, as far as fear of religious institutions or whatever, private education is perhaps frightening to some because it takes the organs of control out of the hands of the government and gives it to the people (as in actually giving it to the people, not State apparatchiks leftists so often confuse with the people). People can be strange, weird, awkward, etc., and if you allow for choice and freedom in education you're going to get some strange results, possibly some troubling ones. But no more troubling than the madness of handing every single child over to the State for indoctrination and a mediocre preparation for integration as a cog in the system.</p> Actual absenteeism might not be as big an issue in the US, but there is certainly an absenteeism of presence, if you will- teachers who show up but aren’t really there, doing little in the way of education. Here in the American South- I don’t know if it’s similar in the rest of the country- the worst comes from teachers who are also coaches, who usually end up “teaching” history or something similar. Granted, there are some excellent teachers who are also coaches, but there are enough cases of simply abysmal failure to instruct that the coach-as-crappy-teacher is something of an accepted element of rural Southern society… That’s just one example from my home region- I’m sure I could multiply them. For another instance, look up the recent New Yorker article on New York City public education. It made me feel rather better about the abysmal state of my native state’s public education, and that’s saying something.

Also, in response to posters who have suggested that private education is somehow elitist- besides ignoring the fact that many private Indian schools are in fact quite inexpensive, they are also ignorant- willfully or otherwise- of the diversity of private education in the US. Again, I know of plenty of small private schools and education cooperatives here in the South whose students come from decidedly lower-middle class families, not the wealthy. Now, in some parts of the South there are private schools that are geared to the moderately wealthy white families, but they are almost indistinguishable from public schools. In most places the well-off white people have their own public schools, and the minority kids theirs.

And finally, as far as fear of religious institutions or whatever, private education is perhaps frightening to some because it takes the organs of control out of the hands of the government and gives it to the people (as in actually giving it to the people, not State apparatchiks leftists so often confuse with the people). People can be strange, weird, awkward, etc., and if you allow for choice and freedom in education you’re going to get some strange results, possibly some troubling ones. But no more troubling than the madness of handing every single child over to the State for indoctrination and a mediocre preparation for integration as a cog in the system.

]]>
By: huh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252256 huh Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:11:57 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252256 <p>knt, i've read many bizarre things in blog comments, but the iits as nehruvian caste conspiracy must rank pretty high up there.</p> <p>your point about the lack of original research is very true, but has absolutely nothing to do with the lack of decently educated grads that would meet the needs of india's engg and computer industries.</p> knt, i’ve read many bizarre things in blog comments, but the iits as nehruvian caste conspiracy must rank pretty high up there.

your point about the lack of original research is very true, but has absolutely nothing to do with the lack of decently educated grads that would meet the needs of india’s engg and computer industries.

]]>
By: Sameer http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252251 Sameer Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:54:42 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252251 <p>If China thought it was laughable to think about catching up to the West, the would never have come as far as they had. Every country has its own issues with glass ceilings/inherited class status, which it must deal with. Quality education for everyone in India has nothing to do with China or any other country. It has to do with what Indians want for our own society and for India. India may or may not become as developed as some countries. Who knows. So what. That is no reason to not bother to improve the education system.</p> <p>The end goal is that every Indian regardless of background gets a quality education, and is able to develop his/her skills and talents. What should be discussed is how to reach that. It may vary depending on the location in India, because the issues may vary. It would be better to see what is the state of the local school, what problems does that school face, and figure out solutions for that school and other schools who face similar strains. Assess the problem and brainstorm solutions. But this all begins with the desire to be better and provide better for Indians and India for no other reason than it is good for Indians and India.</p> If China thought it was laughable to think about catching up to the West, the would never have come as far as they had. Every country has its own issues with glass ceilings/inherited class status, which it must deal with. Quality education for everyone in India has nothing to do with China or any other country. It has to do with what Indians want for our own society and for India. India may or may not become as developed as some countries. Who knows. So what. That is no reason to not bother to improve the education system.

The end goal is that every Indian regardless of background gets a quality education, and is able to develop his/her skills and talents. What should be discussed is how to reach that. It may vary depending on the location in India, because the issues may vary. It would be better to see what is the state of the local school, what problems does that school face, and figure out solutions for that school and other schools who face similar strains. Assess the problem and brainstorm solutions. But this all begins with the desire to be better and provide better for Indians and India for no other reason than it is good for Indians and India.

]]>
By: Anonymous http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252153 Anonymous Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:57:30 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252153 <p>4 missed classes out of 7 used to be the norm. On a good day. And then there were days which started and ended in playgrounds. We took Vivekananda quite literally - "you will be nearer to Heaven through football than through the study of the Bhagavad Gita", and Communist Manifesto was no Bhagavad Gita. Early exposure to Battleship Potemkim notwithstanding, the worst thing CPI(M) government ever did to the state of West Bengal, other than to kill English as second language in primary government schools, was to supplant the nationalist idealistic generation of publish school teachers, often freedom fighters of Gandhian as well as more virulent variety, with a generation of cadre hacks. Dialectical tension was quite exhilarating though, one must admit. Absent teachers were not slackers too pre-occupied with local assembly and municipal elections. Not always. They could be quite entrepreneurial in bootstrapping a private tuition empire.</p> 4 missed classes out of 7 used to be the norm. On a good day. And then there were days which started and ended in playgrounds. We took Vivekananda quite literally – “you will be nearer to Heaven through football than through the study of the Bhagavad Gita”, and Communist Manifesto was no Bhagavad Gita. Early exposure to Battleship Potemkim notwithstanding, the worst thing CPI(M) government ever did to the state of West Bengal, other than to kill English as second language in primary government schools, was to supplant the nationalist idealistic generation of publish school teachers, often freedom fighters of Gandhian as well as more virulent variety, with a generation of cadre hacks. Dialectical tension was quite exhilarating though, one must admit. Absent teachers were not slackers too pre-occupied with local assembly and municipal elections. Not always. They could be quite entrepreneurial in bootstrapping a private tuition empire.

]]>
By: Amrita http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252091 Amrita Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:15:44 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252091 <blockquote> ... accountability is definitely a big concern with not just education in general, but I would argue ANY government funded job.</blockquote> <p>Except the armed forces, maybe?</p> <p>Another difference between privately and publicly funded schools, easily extrapolated from the dismal performance, is that learning is understood to be a distasteful experience in many of the government-run schools, no excitement. A private school has to sell itself, and the ability to generate excitement about the process of learning is key to marketing its offerings.</p> … accountability is definitely a big concern with not just education in general, but I would argue ANY government funded job.

Except the armed forces, maybe?

Another difference between privately and publicly funded schools, easily extrapolated from the dismal performance, is that learning is understood to be a distasteful experience in many of the government-run schools, no excitement. A private school has to sell itself, and the ability to generate excitement about the process of learning is key to marketing its offerings.

]]>
By: Lupus Solitarius http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2009/09/25/teacher_absente/comment-page-1/#comment-252016 Lupus Solitarius Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:34:20 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5965#comment-252016 <blockquote>Saying India will catch up with China is as laughable as saying that Pakistan will catch up with India</blockquote> <p>Or till a couple of decades ago saying that China will catch up with the West.</p> <blockquote>India won't even have the spine to have a population policy which China has implemented long back.</blockquote> <p>Akash, I don't want to get into a China v/s India argument here, as it does nothing for the thread under discussion, but I am glad that we didn't have a Chairman subjecting us to hair brained great leaps. I am glad for the freedoms we enjoy, but never seem to appreciate. I am glad that the state generally tolerates dissenting voices, and intellectuals are not killed for criticising the government. Of course, we marvel at the pace at which things happen, the seeming efficiency with which infrastructure is being created, and focused(though thoroughly unscrupulous) nationalist vision. We know nothing about what we are not shown. Would the citizens of India have tolerated it if, say, Sanjay Gandhi had lived, converted the Congress party into a kind of authoritarian fiefdom, demolished slums and sent the dwellers back to the villages, forcibly stopped migration into the cities, sterilised millions of 'non productive' citizens, crushed the independent media and suppressed religion? I guess not. We have our own system, which is not as efficient, but has it's own advantages. These advantages play out over longer time scales.</p> <blockquote>what matters for an Individual is how it performs during his lifetime.</blockquote> <p>These things change.Where one falls in this curve of development is a quirk of fate, or of random chance. For example a man living in China today may feel great if he lives in Shanghai, or crap if he is a rural poor. His grandfather in the 50s or 60s may have felt very differently about things. This is in no way condoning our weaknesses and corruption, but I don't think the situation is as bleak and hopeless as we often like to portray. Of course you can point out grinding poverty and inequalities, but I feel things are improving, and the pace will only quicken from here.</p> Saying India will catch up with China is as laughable as saying that Pakistan will catch up with India

Or till a couple of decades ago saying that China will catch up with the West.

India won’t even have the spine to have a population policy which China has implemented long back.

Akash, I don’t want to get into a China v/s India argument here, as it does nothing for the thread under discussion, but I am glad that we didn’t have a Chairman subjecting us to hair brained great leaps. I am glad for the freedoms we enjoy, but never seem to appreciate. I am glad that the state generally tolerates dissenting voices, and intellectuals are not killed for criticising the government. Of course, we marvel at the pace at which things happen, the seeming efficiency with which infrastructure is being created, and focused(though thoroughly unscrupulous) nationalist vision. We know nothing about what we are not shown. Would the citizens of India have tolerated it if, say, Sanjay Gandhi had lived, converted the Congress party into a kind of authoritarian fiefdom, demolished slums and sent the dwellers back to the villages, forcibly stopped migration into the cities, sterilised millions of ‘non productive’ citizens, crushed the independent media and suppressed religion? I guess not. We have our own system, which is not as efficient, but has it’s own advantages. These advantages play out over longer time scales.

what matters for an Individual is how it performs during his lifetime.

These things change.Where one falls in this curve of development is a quirk of fate, or of random chance. For example a man living in China today may feel great if he lives in Shanghai, or crap if he is a rural poor. His grandfather in the 50s or 60s may have felt very differently about things. This is in no way condoning our weaknesses and corruption, but I don’t think the situation is as bleak and hopeless as we often like to portray. Of course you can point out grinding poverty and inequalities, but I feel things are improving, and the pace will only quicken from here.

]]>