well that certainly ties things up neatly and coherently.

Today’s religions evolutionized through imitation that discards appraisal of the animals’ waves of the mind. Words are just viruses to the mind. It is pacify and clear of images, sound, words, perceptions of any kind in its original state, so dam! to all the informations. Confucius confused the total essence of the mind. Jesus, Muhammad, Krishna, Buddha, Bahaiullah, Guru Nanak… was shooting about the bushes of fantasies. They were and are the corrupted software’s of thinking. They were the reformers of thoughts that descend to incessant troubled concepts. The animals been left without principle.

Muhammad, a political mentor of the Muslim world, puts it in these words: “All creatures are like a family (Ayal) of God: and he loved the most those who are the most beneficent to ‘his family’.(Animal’s territotial defense)

‘God actually communicates with animals, as the following verse shows: And your Lord revealed to the bee: ‘make hives in the mountains and in the trees, and in (human) habitations’. (16:68) ( Merely THRUGH MY PERSEPTION)

There is no religion, so forget about religions. There is no god, so why tak about god? I am The Creator of my own perceptions, fantasies, theology, thesis, hypothesis, dogmas, karmas and all sorts of ideas to defend the animals’ territory within the planet in my mind.

Anyway, I admire Rushdie for his thoughts and animal’s words. He is a good Muslim’s clown of this age.

i don’t get it.”

That’s the mystery. That’s what it’s all about. Nobody gets it. I remember practically going crazy when I was about 8 trying to imagine eternity. You can’t.

What do the words “religion” and “science” mean to you?

Back in 06, when SM hosted a very similar sets of arguments over the ramifications of Sam Harris’ endorsement of Jainism, my boy No Von Mises (where you been at, son?!) broke through the mist and pointed to a quote that sums up religion quite beautifully and effectively – at least for this metaphysical solipsist.

As for a definition of God, I’m torn between Bulleh Shah and khoofia’s Silverstein-esque ditty.

where I actually offered up my definition of religion.

which defines away anything which you consider irrational or extreme as fringe?

57 · Manju said

seriously. can someone explain to me what was there before the big bang? if there was nothing then how can something come out of nothing? if there was something then the big bang isn’t the beginning, is it? if god created this then who created god? if god was always there couldn’t the world have always been there too, making god unnecessary? i don’t get it.

i believe such arguments about definitional prestidigitation are deemed trollbait.

i don’t get it.