Comments on: Poison in the Name of Politics http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: SM Intern http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217211 SM Intern Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:45:36 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217211 <p><i>46 • <B>vikram</B> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005433.html#comment217157">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>I bet this message stays for a few minutes before the sepia thought police come charging in.</blockquote> <p>Doesn't that remark seem stupid, now? Your obnoxious parting shot still exists.</p> <p><b>Faiqa</b>, We wish you would continue to participate on the thread, if only because you are passionate, eloquent and providing balance; besides, if you go, the communalists will go back to complaining about how "no Muslims" stand up to extremism.</p> <p>Something to keep in mind: <b>the majority of our readers do not comment.</b> Don't take their lack of commenting on this thread as a blessing on terrorist activity.</p> <p>Many of them don't bother discussing posts anymore, in part because the level of discourse here has dropped. We hear/read a lot of, "What's the point in commenting?". Additionally, and especially recently, the loudest commenters are people to whom many of us don't relate. To that end, we wish some of you would remember that this is a second generation-centric blog, about the American Desi experience, and we write what we know. We never intended to be a place to discuss the politics of India. Bringing up what happens there isn’t helpful.</p> <p><b>Finally, there are ways to make your point without resorting to personal attacks.</b> If your comment was deleted, now you know why.</p> 46 • vikram said

I bet this message stays for a few minutes before the sepia thought police come charging in.

Doesn’t that remark seem stupid, now? Your obnoxious parting shot still exists.

Faiqa, We wish you would continue to participate on the thread, if only because you are passionate, eloquent and providing balance; besides, if you go, the communalists will go back to complaining about how “no Muslims” stand up to extremism.

Something to keep in mind: the majority of our readers do not comment. Don’t take their lack of commenting on this thread as a blessing on terrorist activity.

Many of them don’t bother discussing posts anymore, in part because the level of discourse here has dropped. We hear/read a lot of, “What’s the point in commenting?”. Additionally, and especially recently, the loudest commenters are people to whom many of us don’t relate. To that end, we wish some of you would remember that this is a second generation-centric blog, about the American Desi experience, and we write what we know. We never intended to be a place to discuss the politics of India. Bringing up what happens there isn’t helpful.

Finally, there are ways to make your point without resorting to personal attacks. If your comment was deleted, now you know why.

]]>
By: bleh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217209 bleh Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:40:41 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217209 <blockquote>Unfortunately, Muslims in swing states do not have the freedom of praying freely this year.</blockquote> <p>Say what? I live in a swing state. A local church was burned down recently. Does that mean Christians can't pray freely now? And how are you so sure this is tied to the DVD? In every swing state? You're going to condemn every swing state and cause fear/division in every swing state because of what some mo***** c<strong><em>s</em></strong> a***hole did.</p> <p>This is disgusting fear-mongering on the part of Taz. Is this politics of reconciliation and hopeychanginess the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6_eIQQpDGQ">Obama Youth</a> are going to bring us?</p> <p>Have you even seen the video?</p> Unfortunately, Muslims in swing states do not have the freedom of praying freely this year.

Say what? I live in a swing state. A local church was burned down recently. Does that mean Christians can’t pray freely now? And how are you so sure this is tied to the DVD? In every swing state? You’re going to condemn every swing state and cause fear/division in every swing state because of what some mo***** cs a***hole did.

This is disgusting fear-mongering on the part of Taz. Is this politics of reconciliation and hopeychanginess the Obama Youth are going to bring us?

Have you even seen the video?

]]>
By: jk http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217208 jk Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:39:05 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217208 <p>To reply to noblekinsman:</p> <p>FYI They found a can of pepper spray near the mosque</p> <p>http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/09/30/ddn093008mosquecopsweb.html</p> <p>Sorry to burst your bubble, it looks like a crime was committed. I live in Dayton, and I can tell you it is very odd to find cans of pepper spray laying around. It wouldn't suprise me in the least if a couple of good ol' boys sprayed those kids.</p> <p>"No chemical was found on the little girl - nothing at all. She certainly wasn't "poisoned," as you write. It's reasonable that police didn't charge a hate crime because there's absolutely no evidence of a crime, period, nor any injury. "</p> <p>So, following your logic (or lack thereof), the muslims just up and decided to stop their Ramadan services, call 911, and evacuate the building for no apparent reason? And before you reply, fire and rescue squad found no evidence of a natural gas leak.</p> <p>It's safe to say that you don't have the credibility to criticize anyone.</p> To reply to noblekinsman:

FYI They found a can of pepper spray near the mosque

http://www.daytondailynews.com/n/content/oh/story/news/local/2008/09/30/ddn093008mosquecopsweb.html

Sorry to burst your bubble, it looks like a crime was committed. I live in Dayton, and I can tell you it is very odd to find cans of pepper spray laying around. It wouldn’t suprise me in the least if a couple of good ol’ boys sprayed those kids.

“No chemical was found on the little girl – nothing at all. She certainly wasn’t “poisoned,” as you write. It’s reasonable that police didn’t charge a hate crime because there’s absolutely no evidence of a crime, period, nor any injury. “

So, following your logic (or lack thereof), the muslims just up and decided to stop their Ramadan services, call 911, and evacuate the building for no apparent reason? And before you reply, fire and rescue squad found no evidence of a natural gas leak.

It’s safe to say that you don’t have the credibility to criticize anyone.

]]>
By: noblekinsman http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217202 noblekinsman Wed, 01 Oct 2008 18:18:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217202 <p>"The poisoning of little children"</p> <p>you do this alot - you may have some point but you resort to sensationalism and fabrication to prove your point - in this case it's borrowed from a specious "email by a witness," taken second or third hand, at other times you just make something up, and then you're called on it and you say you might have made a mistake, but your point still stands.</p> <p>No chemical was found on the little girl - nothing at all. She certainly wasn't "poisoned," as you write. It's reasonable that police didn't charge a hate crime because there's absolutely no evidence of a crime, period, nor any injury. The imam doesn't link the dvd and the girl being sprayed.</p> <p>You have no credibility as a writer. You lack the ability to criticize the dvd so you make up something else: "and then they poisoned a little girl!"</p> “The poisoning of little children”

you do this alot – you may have some point but you resort to sensationalism and fabrication to prove your point – in this case it’s borrowed from a specious “email by a witness,” taken second or third hand, at other times you just make something up, and then you’re called on it and you say you might have made a mistake, but your point still stands.

No chemical was found on the little girl – nothing at all. She certainly wasn’t “poisoned,” as you write. It’s reasonable that police didn’t charge a hate crime because there’s absolutely no evidence of a crime, period, nor any injury. The imam doesn’t link the dvd and the girl being sprayed.

You have no credibility as a writer. You lack the ability to criticize the dvd so you make up something else: “and then they poisoned a little girl!”

]]>
By: Rukku http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217189 Rukku Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:47:46 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217189 <p>I haven't seen the video (only short clips, including endorsements from various news sources), but let's say the video does an excellent job of portraying the nuances of terrorism, and the difference between terrorists who use Islam as their cause vs. the millions of Muslims with no connection to terrorism whatsoever... I still agree with Taz:</p> <blockquote> Let's say the content is decent - I really think the irresponsible distribution of material that looks like anti-Muslim propaganda is enough for the fear-mongering.</blockquote> <p>From the 10 part clips on youtube, it seems that the documentary is close to (or longer than) a full 60 minutes. How many people are going to actually sit down, and appreciate the full film? The image on the cover - the title, with the symbol of Islam on one side, and a rifle on the other. How nuanced is that?</p> <p>And the fact that the documentary is a well-informed take to viewers here say nothing of how viewers of a particular mindset would view it. Haven't there been studies that show no matter what evidence is presented, individuals will use the evidence to reinforce their prior convictions rather that view the evidence objectively and possibly to overturn their convictions?</p> <p>If this organization's real attempt was to start a dialogue on terrorism, or to inform people, why didn't they sponsor local viewings + discussion? The mass production and way in which the DVD was sent seems like a political maneuver to me.</p> I haven’t seen the video (only short clips, including endorsements from various news sources), but let’s say the video does an excellent job of portraying the nuances of terrorism, and the difference between terrorists who use Islam as their cause vs. the millions of Muslims with no connection to terrorism whatsoever… I still agree with Taz:

Let’s say the content is decent – I really think the irresponsible distribution of material that looks like anti-Muslim propaganda is enough for the fear-mongering.

From the 10 part clips on youtube, it seems that the documentary is close to (or longer than) a full 60 minutes. How many people are going to actually sit down, and appreciate the full film? The image on the cover – the title, with the symbol of Islam on one side, and a rifle on the other. How nuanced is that?

And the fact that the documentary is a well-informed take to viewers here say nothing of how viewers of a particular mindset would view it. Haven’t there been studies that show no matter what evidence is presented, individuals will use the evidence to reinforce their prior convictions rather that view the evidence objectively and possibly to overturn their convictions?

If this organization’s real attempt was to start a dialogue on terrorism, or to inform people, why didn’t they sponsor local viewings + discussion? The mass production and way in which the DVD was sent seems like a political maneuver to me.

]]>
By: Ponniyin Selvan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217185 Ponniyin Selvan Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:49:07 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217185 <p>Looks like youtube has the whole movie. Goto youtube and search for "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West", there are 10 parts.</p> <p>you can figure out for yourself without relying on second hand info.</p> Looks like youtube has the whole movie. Goto youtube and search for “Obsession: Radical Islam’s War Against the West”, there are 10 parts.

you can figure out for yourself without relying on second hand info.

]]>
By: Ponniyin Selvan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217183 Ponniyin Selvan Wed, 01 Oct 2008 13:08:12 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217183 <p>I have seen the documentary "Obsession", a copy was available in my library. I find nothing offensive in there. It is similar to the many "Anand Patwardhan" movies showing "violent Hindu extremism"</p> <p>http://www.patwardhan.com/reviews/rkn_otherreactions.htm</p> <p>I remember seeing one documentary in the state run television in India when Congress was ruling (I think).</p> I have seen the documentary “Obsession”, a copy was available in my library. I find nothing offensive in there. It is similar to the many “Anand Patwardhan” movies showing “violent Hindu extremism”

http://www.patwardhan.com/reviews/rkn_otherreactions.htm

I remember seeing one documentary in the state run television in India when Congress was ruling (I think).

]]>
By: bunty http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217178 bunty Wed, 01 Oct 2008 10:26:48 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217178 <p><i>50 · <b>More Weather</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005433.html#comment217171">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>how many times have Muslims formed a similar congregation to come out and criticize the bombers? </blockquote> <p>In fact the newspapers i read are full of muslims condemning such incidents unequivocally. Change your newspaper.</p> <blockquote> the Muslim community leaders have started issuing half-hearted statements denouncing terrorism. </blockquote> <p>Why are you presuming these are half hearted? Because your arguments are half assed?</p> <p>Eid mubarak, and may the fleas of arabian camels infest the armpits of the world's communalists.</p> 50 · More Weather said

how many times have Muslims formed a similar congregation to come out and criticize the bombers?

In fact the newspapers i read are full of muslims condemning such incidents unequivocally. Change your newspaper.

the Muslim community leaders have started issuing half-hearted statements denouncing terrorism.

Why are you presuming these are half hearted? Because your arguments are half assed?

Eid mubarak, and may the fleas of arabian camels infest the armpits of the world’s communalists.

]]>
By: Faiqa http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217176 Faiqa Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:29:02 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217176 <p><i>"Zainab M.: I don't believe that Muslims have done enough..[and]... are increasingly developing the nasty habit of blaming it all on the United States, Israel and India we have actively tried to stifle any voice, which has dared highlight our flaws...most Muslims in America have more in common with Rush.." </i></p> <p>Yes, a lot of Muslims tend to play the "blame game." A conversation with <i>my</i> parents def. reinforces the point. But, most of my American born Muslim friends don't do that. But, I could have some exceptionally awesome friends.</p> <p>In terms of nutcases, why do I have to take <em>responsibility</em> for <i>not </i>condemning OBL <i>just because he calls himself a Muslim</i>? Muslims are required to stand up to injustice, so, yes, the obligation to condemn him exists <i>because people like him are, in their own way, perpetrators of oppression and social chaos</i>. Taking responsibility for his actions based upon the fact that he's Muslim implies that I believe his actions are grounded in faith.</p> <p>I don't believe that's entirely the case. People like Osama use faith as propaganda, as do many other haters in other religions. (If he's even alive, hello, <i>renal</i> failure??) There's a great deal of academic literature which suggests that "Islamic radicals" are more of a manifestation of post-colonial politics (blame game alert!!). You can read about people like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayyid_Qutb">Sayyid Qutb</a> to get a general idea of that concept. (This is a wiki article, go to the library if you want more - but, be prepared to be put on an extra special DoHS "list").</p> <p>Manji and Sultan <i>have</i> had support from the Muslim community, albeit their critics are far more numerous and far <em>louder</em>. It's hard to be heard over the explosion of a suicide bomber. My uncle, a Muslim, is a publisher who worked very hard to get Manji's book published in both Pakistan and India. He worked with her and book distributors (some of them also Muslim) in those countries to ensure that her voice was heard. I suppose since nobody issues death threats against people like him, there's no "story" there.</p> <p>Zainab, I don't mean to pontificate (oops, too late) or be rude, but you have some reading to do. Read up on abortion in Islam, I think you'll be (pleasantly?) surprised. Prayer in schools? I don't recall any American Muslims demanding everyone say <i>salat</i> in school, but that <i>their</i> kids be allowed to perform prayers privately (a 10 minute thing) and that they be exempted from participation in non-Islamic prayers. Gay marriage? Well, you got me on that. Work needs to be done on gaying up the Ummah (<i>uh, oh, here come the fatwas!!</i> <b>bring it on.</b>). I'm sure some young enterprising gay Muslim academic will one day make the effort to immerse themselves in the texts and prove that God loves them, too. Which I'm sure He does. That is, if he or she is invested deep enough in the religion to even care.</p> <p>I know my posts have been long on these comments, but some of you <i>asked</i> for it. I'm speaking up, ok? Read a few books, talk to a couple of scholars. Or, if you don't have the time, ahem, keep the generalizations to yourself and just be an undercover bigot. I'd prefer that people stop blaming those of us who are trying to affect change within our faith for the actions of terrorist organizations just because all of us happen to pray in the same direction. (<i>Muslims don't kill people, terrorists do</i>. No? Yeah, I didn't think that was very clever either.)</p> <p>In terms of the DVD (oooh, yeah, <i>that</i>). It sucks. But, I don't recall Taz writing that legislation should be passed banning the DVD? She has a right to hate it and think it's garbage if she wants to.</p> <p>So, I've made my point. <b>SM Intern</b>, you don't have to tell me to stop posting. ;) I'd love to continue this dialogue with anyone via e-mail, provided they don't act like a jerk.</p> <p><b>@More Weather</b>: I just read your last comment. Again, with respect, I think you're being very one sided in your approach as well as your criticisms. In the interest of communal harmony here at Sepia Mutiny, I'm going to defer and let you have the last word. Peace.</p> <p>Oh, wait, unless you say something, I'll have the last word. <i>Sweet</i>. Fingers crossed.</p> “Zainab M.: I don’t believe that Muslims have done enough..[and]… are increasingly developing the nasty habit of blaming it all on the United States, Israel and India we have actively tried to stifle any voice, which has dared highlight our flaws…most Muslims in America have more in common with Rush..”

Yes, a lot of Muslims tend to play the “blame game.” A conversation with my parents def. reinforces the point. But, most of my American born Muslim friends don’t do that. But, I could have some exceptionally awesome friends.

In terms of nutcases, why do I have to take responsibility for not condemning OBL just because he calls himself a Muslim? Muslims are required to stand up to injustice, so, yes, the obligation to condemn him exists because people like him are, in their own way, perpetrators of oppression and social chaos. Taking responsibility for his actions based upon the fact that he’s Muslim implies that I believe his actions are grounded in faith.

I don’t believe that’s entirely the case. People like Osama use faith as propaganda, as do many other haters in other religions. (If he’s even alive, hello, renal failure??) There’s a great deal of academic literature which suggests that “Islamic radicals” are more of a manifestation of post-colonial politics (blame game alert!!). You can read about people like Sayyid Qutb to get a general idea of that concept. (This is a wiki article, go to the library if you want more – but, be prepared to be put on an extra special DoHS “list”).

Manji and Sultan have had support from the Muslim community, albeit their critics are far more numerous and far louder. It’s hard to be heard over the explosion of a suicide bomber. My uncle, a Muslim, is a publisher who worked very hard to get Manji’s book published in both Pakistan and India. He worked with her and book distributors (some of them also Muslim) in those countries to ensure that her voice was heard. I suppose since nobody issues death threats against people like him, there’s no “story” there.

Zainab, I don’t mean to pontificate (oops, too late) or be rude, but you have some reading to do. Read up on abortion in Islam, I think you’ll be (pleasantly?) surprised. Prayer in schools? I don’t recall any American Muslims demanding everyone say salat in school, but that their kids be allowed to perform prayers privately (a 10 minute thing) and that they be exempted from participation in non-Islamic prayers. Gay marriage? Well, you got me on that. Work needs to be done on gaying up the Ummah (uh, oh, here come the fatwas!! bring it on.). I’m sure some young enterprising gay Muslim academic will one day make the effort to immerse themselves in the texts and prove that God loves them, too. Which I’m sure He does. That is, if he or she is invested deep enough in the religion to even care.

I know my posts have been long on these comments, but some of you asked for it. I’m speaking up, ok? Read a few books, talk to a couple of scholars. Or, if you don’t have the time, ahem, keep the generalizations to yourself and just be an undercover bigot. I’d prefer that people stop blaming those of us who are trying to affect change within our faith for the actions of terrorist organizations just because all of us happen to pray in the same direction. (Muslims don’t kill people, terrorists do. No? Yeah, I didn’t think that was very clever either.)

In terms of the DVD (oooh, yeah, that). It sucks. But, I don’t recall Taz writing that legislation should be passed banning the DVD? She has a right to hate it and think it’s garbage if she wants to.

So, I’ve made my point. SM Intern, you don’t have to tell me to stop posting. ;) I’d love to continue this dialogue with anyone via e-mail, provided they don’t act like a jerk.

@More Weather: I just read your last comment. Again, with respect, I think you’re being very one sided in your approach as well as your criticisms. In the interest of communal harmony here at Sepia Mutiny, I’m going to defer and let you have the last word. Peace.

Oh, wait, unless you say something, I’ll have the last word. Sweet. Fingers crossed.

]]>
By: Nesha http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/30/poisoning_of_mu/comment-page-2/#comment-217175 Nesha Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:23:42 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5433#comment-217175 <blockquote> most Muslims in America have more in common with Rush Limbaugh than even with the Right wing of the Democratic Party. </blockquote> <p>really? Most Muslims? In all of America? Please, don't let ridiculous generalizations and hyperbole stop you from making asinine statements.</p> <p>Eid Mubarak, everyone.</p> most Muslims in America have more in common with Rush Limbaugh than even with the Right wing of the Democratic Party.

really? Most Muslims? In all of America? Please, don’t let ridiculous generalizations and hyperbole stop you from making asinine statements.

Eid Mubarak, everyone.

]]>