Comments on: Notes from the RNC, Post 7: The early bird gets the war criminal, Dhillon speaks, and final thoughts http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Harbeer http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215722 Harbeer Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:23:48 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215722 <p>Oh wait, I get it. A party is a group of members, huh?</p> Oh wait, I get it. A party is a group of members, huh?

]]>
By: Harbeer http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215720 Harbeer Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:18:51 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215720 <p><i>72 · <b>Manju</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005401.html#comment215648">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>get a grip on yourself Nayagan...continuing to think of her in sexualized terms will put your party in a sticky situation.</blockquote> <p>By "party" you mean...?</p> 72 · Manju said

get a grip on yourself Nayagan…continuing to think of her in sexualized terms will put your party in a sticky situation.

By “party” you mean…?

]]>
By: Dr AmNonymous http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215714 Dr AmNonymous Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:41:39 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215714 <blockquote>I support the rights of a woman (or anyone) to her/their own body and what they want to do with it, as long as they are not in a legally binding social contract (marriage/civil union etc.)</blockquote> <p>I'm assuming you're talking about abortion here, and not marital rape? But how do you draw the distinction - legally I mean? Emotionally i can understand why it's kind to consult your partner(s), but legally? What happened to libertarianism - doesn't extend into intersections with feminism? :)</p> I support the rights of a woman (or anyone) to her/their own body and what they want to do with it, as long as they are not in a legally binding social contract (marriage/civil union etc.)

I’m assuming you’re talking about abortion here, and not marital rape? But how do you draw the distinction – legally I mean? Emotionally i can understand why it’s kind to consult your partner(s), but legally? What happened to libertarianism – doesn’t extend into intersections with feminism? :)

]]>
By: RahulD http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215682 RahulD Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:49:03 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215682 <p>I think her stand on Rape Survivors is stupid, I support the rights of a woman (or anyone) to her/their own body and what they want to do with it, as long as they are not in a legally binding social contract (marriage/civil union etc.)</p> I think her stand on Rape Survivors is stupid, I support the rights of a woman (or anyone) to her/their own body and what they want to do with it, as long as they are not in a legally binding social contract (marriage/civil union etc.)

]]>
By: Dr AmNonymous http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215674 Dr AmNonymous Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:55:14 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215674 <p><i>64 · <b>RahulD</b> Wow...</p> <p>Okay 1. Before 2008, States paid for the charge to administer Rape Kits to victims of sexual assault 2. Before 2008, States that didn't pay for it had towns factor it into their own budget 3. In 2000, Tony KnownDouchebag Knowles (the corrupt fellow Republican whom Sarah Palin despised and later ran against/beat) signed in a bill that required towns in Alaska charge victims for them to recieve a rape kit. This was when Palin was mayor of Wasilla 4. The Police Chief in Wasilla (which has approximately less than 7 rapes a year), at the time, refused to show support the bill by SUGGESTING that the procedure should involve charging the victim's Insurance Companies.</p> <p>Those are the facts of the story and inspite of Nayagan's belief that I don't check my facts, I do</blockquote></p> <p>Hey, me too! It all comes from <a href="http://www.frontiersman.com/articles/2000/05/23/news.txt">one source</a> as far as I can tell, so I don't know how we could have such different interpretations of it. Do you have another source?</p> <p><</p> <p>blockquote>While the Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies have covered the cost of exams, which cost between $300 to $1,200 apiece, <b>the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests.</p> <p>Wasilla Police Chief Charlie Fannon does not agree with the new legislation, saying the law will require the city and communities to come up with more funds to cover the costs of the forensic exams.</p> <p>In the past weve charged the cost of exams to the victims insurance company when possible. I just dont want to see any more burden put on the taxpayer, Fannon said.</p> <p>According to Fannon, the new law will cost the Wasilla Police Department approximately $5,000 to $14,000 a year to collect evidence for sexual assault cases.</p> <p>Ultimately it is the criminal who should bear the burden of the added costs, Fannon said.</b></p> <p>Wasilla Police Chief Charlie Fannon does not agree with the new legislation, saying the law will require the city and communities to come up with more funds to cover the costs of the forensic exams.>/blockquote></p> <p>btw, i notice you didn't respond to her position on abortion for rape survivors ;) cmon, just join the dark side. we're a lot saner! you'll like us!</p> 64 · RahulD Wow…

Okay 1. Before 2008, States paid for the charge to administer Rape Kits to victims of sexual assault 2. Before 2008, States that didn’t pay for it had towns factor it into their own budget 3. In 2000, Tony KnownDouchebag Knowles (the corrupt fellow Republican whom Sarah Palin despised and later ran against/beat) signed in a bill that required towns in Alaska charge victims for them to recieve a rape kit. This was when Palin was mayor of Wasilla 4. The Police Chief in Wasilla (which has approximately less than 7 rapes a year), at the time, refused to show support the bill by SUGGESTING that the procedure should involve charging the victim’s Insurance Companies.

Those are the facts of the story and inspite of Nayagan’s belief that I don’t check my facts, I do

Hey, me too! It all comes from one source as far as I can tell, so I don’t know how we could have such different interpretations of it. Do you have another source?

<

blockquote>While the Alaska State Troopers and most municipal police agencies have covered the cost of exams, which cost between $300 to $1,200 apiece, the Wasilla police department does charge the victims of sexual assault for the tests.

Wasilla Police Chief Charlie Fannon does not agree with the new legislation, saying the law will require the city and communities to come up with more funds to cover the costs of the forensic exams.

In the past weve charged the cost of exams to the victims insurance company when possible. I just dont want to see any more burden put on the taxpayer, Fannon said.

According to Fannon, the new law will cost the Wasilla Police Department approximately $5,000 to $14,000 a year to collect evidence for sexual assault cases.

Ultimately it is the criminal who should bear the burden of the added costs, Fannon said.

Wasilla Police Chief Charlie Fannon does not agree with the new legislation, saying the law will require the city and communities to come up with more funds to cover the costs of the forensic exams.>/blockquote>

btw, i notice you didn’t respond to her position on abortion for rape survivors ;) cmon, just join the dark side. we’re a lot saner! you’ll like us!

]]>
By: Zazou http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215656 Zazou Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:43:34 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215656 <p>But isn't this all a little like running for homecoming queen? And doesn't the home team hope (or maybe assume)God in on their side?</p> But isn’t this all a little like running for homecoming queen? And doesn’t the home team hope (or maybe assume)God in on their side?

]]>
By: Manju http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215648 Manju Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:01:35 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215648 <p><i>71 · <B>Nayagan</B> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005401.html#comment215646">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>he was transfixed by Palin's paglian cthonic sax appeal</blockquote> <p>get a grip on yourself Nayagan. Palin could soon be the most powerful woman in the world, and continuing to think of her in sexualized terms will put your party in a sticky situation.</p> 71 · Nayagan said

he was transfixed by Palin’s paglian cthonic sax appeal

get a grip on yourself Nayagan. Palin could soon be the most powerful woman in the world, and continuing to think of her in sexualized terms will put your party in a sticky situation.

]]>
By: Nayagan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215646 Nayagan Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:46:43 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215646 <p><i>70 · <b>Manju</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005401.html#comment215645">said</a></i></p> <blockquote><i>68 · <b>RahulD</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005401.html#comment215627" rel="nofollow">said</a></i> <blockquote>Yes...</blockquote> if u say so rahul. but those ellipses seem suspicious, like some of your keys aren't functioning for some reason... </blockquote> <p>he was transfixed by Palin's paglian cthonic sax appeal</p> 70 · Manju said

68 · RahulD said
Yes…
if u say so rahul. but those ellipses seem suspicious, like some of your keys aren’t functioning for some reason…

he was transfixed by Palin’s paglian cthonic sax appeal

]]>
By: Manju http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215645 Manju Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:32:02 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215645 <p><i>68 · <B>RahulD</B> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005401.html#comment215627">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>Yes...</blockquote> <p>if u say so rahul. but those ellipses seem suspicious, like some of your keys aren't functioning for some reason...</p> 68 · RahulD said

Yes…

if u say so rahul. but those ellipses seem suspicious, like some of your keys aren’t functioning for some reason…

]]>
By: Zazou http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/09/06/notes_from_the_7/comment-page-2/#comment-215637 Zazou Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:36:31 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5401#comment-215637 <p>ha ha!</p> ha ha!

]]>