Comments on: If A Desi Can Be Miniaturized & Automated… http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: redr http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-212039 redr Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:49:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-212039 <p>While the cheap Eurocentricism-baiting has been pretty well deconstructed here, I think it's worth adding that Europeans and Americans refer to Europe/America as "the West," a term which obviously means "west of the Eurasian land mass." So the implication that anyone is making Europe "The Center" is pretty absurd, as is the idea that one should be offended to have Westerners consider some place not to be the center of the world. And, anyway, just about every major civilization in history has considered itself to be the center of the world, so it's kind of ridiculous to single out Eurocentricism for umbrage here. Isn't the entire pretence for disliking the term "South Asian" itself based on Desi-centricism?</p> <p>To the (semi) Eurocentric list, I'd add the Mediterranean, as this literally means "middle of the world." I say "semi" because that designation still accords North Africa and West Asia with positions just as "central" as that of Europe. And it's all just relic of the classical period anyway; given the roles that Italy and Greece play in modern Europe, I have a hard time getting too worked up about it.</p> While the cheap Eurocentricism-baiting has been pretty well deconstructed here, I think it’s worth adding that Europeans and Americans refer to Europe/America as “the West,” a term which obviously means “west of the Eurasian land mass.” So the implication that anyone is making Europe “The Center” is pretty absurd, as is the idea that one should be offended to have Westerners consider some place not to be the center of the world. And, anyway, just about every major civilization in history has considered itself to be the center of the world, so it’s kind of ridiculous to single out Eurocentricism for umbrage here. Isn’t the entire pretence for disliking the term “South Asian” itself based on Desi-centricism?

To the (semi) Eurocentric list, I’d add the Mediterranean, as this literally means “middle of the world.” I say “semi” because that designation still accords North Africa and West Asia with positions just as “central” as that of Europe. And it’s all just relic of the classical period anyway; given the roles that Italy and Greece play in modern Europe, I have a hard time getting too worked up about it.

]]>
By: cookiebrown http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211994 cookiebrown Mon, 11 Aug 2008 05:51:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211994 <blockquote>(South of what? Is Europe implicitly the center/norm?)</blockquote> <p>This complaint is simply absurd.</p> <p>Uncle Cookiebrown says "what's the matter, don't you ABDs study geography? In my day in India, I could draw a map of the world, freehand...yadda yadda yadda".</p> <p>South Asia= The southern part of the Asian continent. South East Asia = The south eastern part. West Asia = Called that for decades by Indians and others. East Asia=China and Taiwan. This is very common usage, as also North East Asia= Japan and Korea.</p> <p>How on earth is this geographic nomenclature eurocentric?</p> <p>On the other hand, the older terms Near East, Middle East and Far East are definitely Europe centered.</p> (South of what? Is Europe implicitly the center/norm?)

This complaint is simply absurd.

Uncle Cookiebrown says “what’s the matter, don’t you ABDs study geography? In my day in India, I could draw a map of the world, freehand…yadda yadda yadda”.

South Asia= The southern part of the Asian continent. South East Asia = The south eastern part. West Asia = Called that for decades by Indians and others. East Asia=China and Taiwan. This is very common usage, as also North East Asia= Japan and Korea.

How on earth is this geographic nomenclature eurocentric?

On the other hand, the older terms Near East, Middle East and Far East are definitely Europe centered.

]]>
By: Camille http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211918 Camille Sun, 10 Aug 2008 01:30:20 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211918 <p>I understand that the term "South Asia" comes from the history of 1950s Cold War-funded Area Studies programs, but the subcontinent is truly in the central southern part of the continent of Asia. Relative to Europe it's way far out there, so I think, relative to terms like "Middle East," it's not that bad.</p> <p>DizzyDesi, Cambodia, etc., are only considered part of "South Asia" by people who don't have a strong sense of geography; it's not a term used commonly in area or international studies when referring to those regions. Much more common is calling that region a) Indochina, or b) Southeast Asia (I'm using these terms in a post-WWI historical context and thus understand they are imperial, colonial, etc., etc.). Afghanistan has shifted over time, but by and large I think most people would group it in Central Asia ever since the 1980 Soviet invasion.</p> <p>I like desi, but I understand why it is frustrating for "Southies" (although when you're from a "North-Western" area everything is South). It's not really an indigenous or inclusive term, even when it is meant to be, although I much prefer it over something like Hindustani.</p> <p>Is the Desi analyzer pronounced "desi" with a soft D, or "Dezzee" like Desi Arnaz? Just curious :)</p> I understand that the term “South Asia” comes from the history of 1950s Cold War-funded Area Studies programs, but the subcontinent is truly in the central southern part of the continent of Asia. Relative to Europe it’s way far out there, so I think, relative to terms like “Middle East,” it’s not that bad.

DizzyDesi, Cambodia, etc., are only considered part of “South Asia” by people who don’t have a strong sense of geography; it’s not a term used commonly in area or international studies when referring to those regions. Much more common is calling that region a) Indochina, or b) Southeast Asia (I’m using these terms in a post-WWI historical context and thus understand they are imperial, colonial, etc., etc.). Afghanistan has shifted over time, but by and large I think most people would group it in Central Asia ever since the 1980 Soviet invasion.

I like desi, but I understand why it is frustrating for “Southies” (although when you’re from a “North-Western” area everything is South). It’s not really an indigenous or inclusive term, even when it is meant to be, although I much prefer it over something like Hindustani.

Is the Desi analyzer pronounced “desi” with a soft D, or “Dezzee” like Desi Arnaz? Just curious :)

]]>
By: Penguin http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211901 Penguin Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:07:36 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211901 <p>South Asia is NOT wholly appropriate, Murali, even if Central Asia is not a eurocentric concept.</p> South Asia is NOT wholly appropriate, Murali, even if Central Asia is not a eurocentric concept.

]]>
By: DDiA http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211873 DDiA Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:13:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211873 <p>I was somewhat tipsy last night and was leafing through the new Economist that I had just picked up from my mailbox. I love going to the technology sections first, which is the equivalent of reading the cartoon strips first in a daily newspaper, when I spotted this article. The first thought that I had was -- this should be on Sepia Mutiny under the category of "non-South Asian, yet Desi". Then I thought of Desi Arnaz.</p> I was somewhat tipsy last night and was leafing through the new Economist that I had just picked up from my mailbox. I love going to the technology sections first, which is the equivalent of reading the cartoon strips first in a daily newspaper, when I spotted this article. The first thought that I had was — this should be on Sepia Mutiny under the category of “non-South Asian, yet Desi”. Then I thought of Desi Arnaz.

]]>
By: Raj http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211866 Raj Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:35:07 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211866 <p>I prefer South Asian over desi. The reason? Many of those who use the term desi often seem to think it only covers North Indian and Pakistani Hindi/Urdu speakers. Or only North Indians. Others claim that only those who follow Indic religions are desi (excluding Muslims and Christians). Further, there are many South Asians who don't even know what desi means or that it is even used as a term, whereas the English 'South Asian' makes sense in of itself. I think the only reson the term South Asian sounds "stuffy" is simply because it isn't used a lot. Personally I think it has a nice ring to it :)</p> I prefer South Asian over desi. The reason? Many of those who use the term desi often seem to think it only covers North Indian and Pakistani Hindi/Urdu speakers. Or only North Indians. Others claim that only those who follow Indic religions are desi (excluding Muslims and Christians). Further, there are many South Asians who don’t even know what desi means or that it is even used as a term, whereas the English ‘South Asian’ makes sense in of itself. I think the only reson the term South Asian sounds “stuffy” is simply because it isn’t used a lot. Personally I think it has a nice ring to it :)

]]>
By: anandi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211864 anandi Sat, 09 Aug 2008 09:20:17 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211864 <p>Haha. I read about that technique recently and wondered if SM would pick up on it ;)</p> Haha. I read about that technique recently and wondered if SM would pick up on it ;)

]]>
By: DesiInNJ http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211848 DesiInNJ Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:24:10 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211848 <p>Desi works for us. A few other usages are irrelevant.</p> Desi works for us. A few other usages are irrelevant.

]]>
By: tin foil man http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211840 tin foil man Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:32:37 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211840 <blockquote>If a Desi analyzer can be <b>miniaturized and automated</b></blockquote> <p>I KNEW this was coming! First to browns, then to robots. They are taking over, people!</p> If a Desi analyzer can be miniaturized and automated

I KNEW this was coming! First to browns, then to robots. They are taking over, people!

]]>
By: ptr_vivek http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/08/08/yet_another_des/comment-page-1/#comment-211833 ptr_vivek Sat, 09 Aug 2008 00:09:25 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5329#comment-211833 <blockquote>(South of what? Is Europe implicitly the center/norm?)</blockquote> <p>Not south <i>of</i>, but south <i>in</i>. So not relative to Europe at all. Those would be Near East, Middle East, Far East, Orient.</p> (South of what? Is Europe implicitly the center/norm?)

Not south of, but south in. So not relative to Europe at all. Those would be Near East, Middle East, Far East, Orient.

]]>