I don’t know what you’ve been reading or smoking, but its making you say some silly things dude.

Lets not confuse ‘Rahul’ (the star commentor with highly researched posts) with ‘Rahul S’ (bigotted posts).

How am I bigot if I’m an equal opportunity hater?

Lets not confuse ‘Rahul’ (the star commentor with highly researched posts) with ‘Rahul S’ (bigotted posts).

Yes, I was kidding around. If I confused Rahul S for Rahul, my life would be in danger of collapsing. Yeah, I’m serious.

remember the MC Hammer style pants popular with a salwar kameez?

Remember them? I’m rocking a pair right now, chief.

A person whose in-outs measured in a 24 hour period

point of clarification: surely you don’t mean in-outs with a single partner over the course of a day? why should a woman be punished for the virility of her partner? secondly, with your sexist definitions, you are (re)producing patriarchal disciplinary norms. indeed, pseudo-scientific definitions that use dubious quantifiable metrics are privileging the objective over the subjective. traditional philosophy has associated the subjective with “emotional judgment,” a term that has been used throughout history describe the flaws of women’s moral psychology. (see the ‘Emotion in Philosophy’ section here). shame on you, rahul!

Yep, the real problem with the use of that word is definitional, not that it is judgmental. Personally, I have gone with the following definition: A person whose in-outs measured in a 24 hour period, and the 90th percentile computed over a period of 3 months or 80 “business” days, whichever “comes” earlier, meets or exceeds the normalized benchmark of 23.768 measured over an 18 month period from January 2006 – June 2007.

Of course, there are some liberals who are arguing for a 99.999th percentile cutoff and a benchmark number of 97.356, whereas the conservative movement led by James Dobson is pushing for a 50th percentile cutoff over a period of 5 “business” days based on the intent of the founding fathers.

There, the scab just fell off this internet communication. But mostly out of boredom, I think.

tell that “hindu slut” to wear that damn salwar kameez.

Maybe it is because Indian men experience the Hindu rate of growth that Indian women are forced to such desperation?

Alan Greenspan declared that the “Hindu rate of growth” is a derisive comment. Plus, the this rate of growth is no longer in play since India’s rate of growth is pretty high these days (9% or something like that). You better stop making those derisive comments buddy. Tsk Tsk.

Maybe it is because Indian men experience the Hindu rate of growth that Indian women are forced to such desperation?