Comments on: Lee Kuan Yew Speaketh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Rahul S http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198506 Rahul S Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:27:08 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198506 <p><i>46 · <b>BrownGuyVA</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005112.html#comment198504">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>A Slight Correction, China's GDP (nominal) is $2.7T and their pop is 1.3 billion,that works out to a per-capita income of $2,000 not $2,800. India's per capita GDP is $980 (nitpicking hehe). Anyway pretty interesting article. </blockquote> <p>According to CIA factbook, China's GDP/capita as of last year was $5,300. India's GDP/capita was $2,700. Shouldn't we adjust it for purchasing power parity. Isn't that a better measure?</p> <p>https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html</p> 46 · BrownGuyVA said

A Slight Correction, China’s GDP (nominal) is $2.7T and their pop is 1.3 billion,that works out to a per-capita income of $2,000 not $2,800. India’s per capita GDP is $980 (nitpicking hehe). Anyway pretty interesting article.

According to CIA factbook, China’s GDP/capita as of last year was $5,300. India’s GDP/capita was $2,700. Shouldn’t we adjust it for purchasing power parity. Isn’t that a better measure?

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ch.html

]]>
By: BrownGuyVA http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198504 BrownGuyVA Wed, 02 Apr 2008 04:02:20 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198504 <p>A Slight Correction, China's GDP (nominal) is $2.7T and their pop is 1.3 billion,that works out to a per-capita income of $2,000 not $2,800. India's per capita GDP is $980 (nitpicking hehe). Anyway pretty interesting article.</p> A Slight Correction, China’s GDP (nominal) is $2.7T and their pop is 1.3 billion,that works out to a per-capita income of $2,000 not $2,800. India’s per capita GDP is $980 (nitpicking hehe). Anyway pretty interesting article.

]]>
By: Vyasa http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198430 Vyasa Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:46:20 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198430 <p>A video comparing India's prospects to China's:</p> <p>http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=111c852f7c4c8dfef62dca3a791df9a4aa9ba49d</p> <p>Fully agree with the conclusion.</p> A video comparing India’s prospects to China’s:

http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=111c852f7c4c8dfef62dca3a791df9a4aa9ba49d

Fully agree with the conclusion.

]]>
By: Samir http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198384 Samir Mon, 31 Mar 2008 14:27:39 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198384 <p><i>42 · <b><a href="http://hester23.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Rahul S</a></b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005112.html#comment198364">said</a></i></p> <blockquote><i>41 · <b>boston_mahesh</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005112.html#comment198342" rel="nofollow">said</a></i> <blockquote>Is China and/or India manipulating their numbers?</blockquote> Perhaps. Where are you getting your numbers from? I believe China's FDI (foreign direct investment) is way higher, and could be attributed to the high growth rate of China. If only India did that...man, bharat would be at the top. </blockquote> <p>Actually the FDI numbers are calculated differently and hence reported differently. <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1017584.cms">here is the link</a></p> 42 · Rahul S said

41 · boston_mahesh said
Is China and/or India manipulating their numbers?
Perhaps. Where are you getting your numbers from? I believe China’s FDI (foreign direct investment) is way higher, and could be attributed to the high growth rate of China. If only India did that…man, bharat would be at the top.

Actually the FDI numbers are calculated differently and hence reported differently. here is the link

]]>
By: Rahul S http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198365 Rahul S Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:44:29 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198365 <p><i>42 · <b><a href="http://hester23.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Rahul S</a></b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005112.html#comment198364">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>bharat would be at the top</blockquote> <p>I meant to say bharat would pretty well off.</p> 42 · Rahul S said

bharat would be at the top

I meant to say bharat would pretty well off.

]]>
By: Rahul S http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198364 Rahul S Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:43:18 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198364 <p><i>41 · <b>boston_mahesh</b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/005112.html#comment198342">said</a></i></p> <blockquote>Is China and/or India manipulating their numbers?</blockquote> <p>Perhaps. Where are you getting your numbers from? I believe China's FDI (foreign direct investment) is way higher, and could be attributed to the high growth rate of China. If only India did that...man, bharat would be at the top.</p> 41 · boston_mahesh said

Is China and/or India manipulating their numbers?

Perhaps. Where are you getting your numbers from? I believe China’s FDI (foreign direct investment) is way higher, and could be attributed to the high growth rate of China. If only India did that…man, bharat would be at the top.

]]>
By: boston_mahesh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198342 boston_mahesh Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:03:35 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198342 <p>one thing that i don't understand, is this: China's GDP/Person (or PPP/person) surpassed India's in '89. However, in ~20 years, they've tripled their GDP/person.</p> <p>But wait a minute, their growth rate has been about 11% and India's has been about 8%. I've done the math, and the numbers don't add up.</p> <p>Is China and/or India manipulating their numbers?</p> one thing that i don’t understand, is this: China’s GDP/Person (or PPP/person) surpassed India’s in ’89. However, in ~20 years, they’ve tripled their GDP/person.

But wait a minute, their growth rate has been about 11% and India’s has been about 8%. I’ve done the math, and the numbers don’t add up.

Is China and/or India manipulating their numbers?

]]>
By: Calling Ludus http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198319 Calling Ludus Sun, 30 Mar 2008 08:31:04 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198319 <p>Quote: "Given India’s current real, per-capita GDP of $1000 vs. China’s $2800, and an overall GDP of $1T vs. China’s $2.8T, Lee is projecting some pretty rapid gap closing by India."</p> <p>What are you talking about dude??? $1000 vs $2800 ,$IT vs $ 2.8T .. are the populations of India/China both exactly equal i.e. 1 Billion today ?</p> <p>Secondly if one is larger than other <b>and</b> the smaller grows at 60-70% of larger.. <i>the gap grows smaller</i>??</p> <p>Either we need to speak to your maths teacher or you better let us know what you been smoking.</p> Quote: “Given India’s current real, per-capita GDP of $1000 vs. China’s $2800, and an overall GDP of $1T vs. China’s $2.8T, Lee is projecting some pretty rapid gap closing by India.”

What are you talking about dude??? $1000 vs $2800 ,$IT vs $ 2.8T .. are the populations of India/China both exactly equal i.e. 1 Billion today ?

Secondly if one is larger than other and the smaller grows at 60-70% of larger.. the gap grows smaller??

Either we need to speak to your maths teacher or you better let us know what you been smoking.

]]>
By: umber desi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198294 umber desi Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:42:00 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198294 <p>RC #35</p> <p>I am not making any such statements and was just replying to Amitabh's comment so please don't attribute something to my comment which is not there, also I don't speak for all DBDs so it will be great if you don't either. I am speaking of my experience.</p> RC #35

I am not making any such statements and was just replying to Amitabh’s comment so please don’t attribute something to my comment which is not there, also I don’t speak for all DBDs so it will be great if you don’t either. I am speaking of my experience.

]]>
By: monimoni http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2008/03/27/lee_kuan_yew_sp/comment-page-1/#comment-198287 monimoni Sat, 29 Mar 2008 18:14:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=5112#comment-198287 <blockquote>Between him and his father, there's a clear breach in cultural continuity - never mind between him and me. You asked me to predict what it will be in 50 years or even 20 years. I cannot, because we have left our moorings.</blockquote> <p>In the last decade, there has been a spike in the # of foriegn students at US universities that represent the elite in their own countries. The US is now the hottest place to go to college. I wonder what the effect will be of all these US educated leaders all over the world, since their "cultural moorings" are increasingly US-centered.</p> Between him and his father, there’s a clear breach in cultural continuity – never mind between him and me. You asked me to predict what it will be in 50 years or even 20 years. I cannot, because we have left our moorings.

In the last decade, there has been a spike in the # of foriegn students at US universities that represent the elite in their own countries. The US is now the hottest place to go to college. I wonder what the effect will be of all these US educated leaders all over the world, since their “cultural moorings” are increasingly US-centered.

]]>