Comments on: “Our Vanity Is Matched Only By Our Persecution Complex” http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: portmanteau http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-6/#comment-183020 portmanteau Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:44:17 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183020 <p>A N N A, perhaps that was what was needed with insults being traded here like camels in Pushkar. I was very disappointed by the personal swipes here: "deluded bourgeoisie liberal wretches," "gauche engineers and MBAs," "khaki-wearing fascist swyamsevaks."</p> <p>You're right that people here are adults, and can play fair here. Concede graciously, and argue without stereotyping or name-calling. No such luck though.</p> <p>Scores of comments ago, this thread was actually enjoyable.</p> A N N A, perhaps that was what was needed with insults being traded here like camels in Pushkar. I was very disappointed by the personal swipes here: “deluded bourgeoisie liberal wretches,” “gauche engineers and MBAs,” “khaki-wearing fascist swyamsevaks.”

You’re right that people here are adults, and can play fair here. Concede graciously, and argue without stereotyping or name-calling. No such luck though.

Scores of comments ago, this thread was actually enjoyable.

]]>
By: A N N A http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-6/#comment-183017 A N N A Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:30:01 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183017 <p><a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/004904.html#comment183010">Seriously disappointed in the moderators</a>, eh? You mean the VOLUNTEER moderators? Because that would be classy. When we get paid to do this and we can leave our day jobs and divy up watching over this chaos in to shifts, THEN you can complain about inconsistent moderating.</p> <p>In the meanwhile, stop lying about "if this were about sucky Christianity or terrorist Islam, these fantasy-land dwelling mutineers would've swooped in. wah!". See my first paragraph for the cause of "inconsistent" application of guidelines by over-extended volunteers. We do our best with this site and yes, we're imperfect. However, we have <b>never</b> disrespected Hinduism in the way some of you have wet dreams about-- "oooh, pseudo-secular south asian progressives hating vulnerable mother india! we must go to their site and hit F5 and torment ourselves as a witness to her virtual pillaging, then we can bitch about it in the comments! victory is ours!"</p> <p>.</p> <p>The mutineers are real people, with real lives and obligations-- and sometimes, all of that prevents us from being here. But I shouldn't be surprised-- last year when there was a death in my family, I was eviscerated for not paying attention to the threads. How low will some of you stoop? What if there's an emergency in one of the bloggers' families? What if one of us is in the hospital? Do we have to announce that, so that you'll cut us some slack/treat us with the fairness we deserve and should have WITHOUT such destruction to our privacy?</p> <p>Shame on you. You know, you're not toddlers who require constant vigilance. You're adults who should be able to carry on a civil discussion. And if you come here all the time, we would be so grateful if you could pitch in and help moderate if you see that we're absent.</p> <p>I'm going to close this thread, because some of you don't deserve the right to post on it, after your unnecessary and hurtful words about SM and our criminal, inexcusable absence. As for the rest of you, ending this conversation is for the best-- it's impossible to weed out the trolling at this point and you deserve more than this.</p> <p>Thread closes at 9:45pm. Well-done, to those who caused this.</p> Seriously disappointed in the moderators, eh? You mean the VOLUNTEER moderators? Because that would be classy. When we get paid to do this and we can leave our day jobs and divy up watching over this chaos in to shifts, THEN you can complain about inconsistent moderating.

In the meanwhile, stop lying about “if this were about sucky Christianity or terrorist Islam, these fantasy-land dwelling mutineers would’ve swooped in. wah!”. See my first paragraph for the cause of “inconsistent” application of guidelines by over-extended volunteers. We do our best with this site and yes, we’re imperfect. However, we have never disrespected Hinduism in the way some of you have wet dreams about– “oooh, pseudo-secular south asian progressives hating vulnerable mother india! we must go to their site and hit F5 and torment ourselves as a witness to her virtual pillaging, then we can bitch about it in the comments! victory is ours!”

.

The mutineers are real people, with real lives and obligations– and sometimes, all of that prevents us from being here. But I shouldn’t be surprised– last year when there was a death in my family, I was eviscerated for not paying attention to the threads. How low will some of you stoop? What if there’s an emergency in one of the bloggers’ families? What if one of us is in the hospital? Do we have to announce that, so that you’ll cut us some slack/treat us with the fairness we deserve and should have WITHOUT such destruction to our privacy?

Shame on you. You know, you’re not toddlers who require constant vigilance. You’re adults who should be able to carry on a civil discussion. And if you come here all the time, we would be so grateful if you could pitch in and help moderate if you see that we’re absent.

I’m going to close this thread, because some of you don’t deserve the right to post on it, after your unnecessary and hurtful words about SM and our criminal, inexcusable absence. As for the rest of you, ending this conversation is for the best– it’s impossible to weed out the trolling at this point and you deserve more than this.

Thread closes at 9:45pm. Well-done, to those who caused this.

]]>
By: JGandhi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-6/#comment-183015 JGandhi Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:09:29 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183015 <blockquote>You are clearly outgunned here, buddy. You guys are generally older and in possession of an engineering or business degree (or, both). Doesn't matter which one, but mainly it's the lack of exposure to some humanities and social science courses.</blockquote> <p>Uhh actually I'm in my early 20s and I majored in religious studies.</p> <p>What is it with people making all sorts of detailed comments on who I am and what I believe?</p> <p>I suspect I am much more well-read than many here who get their perspective on Indian politics from Pankaj Mishra and the other PC authors they read in college. I actually read Hindutva literature, anti-Hindutva literature, Islamist literature, moderate Islamic literature, etc. Those who interpolate a whole set of beliefs from an argument on one topic and start flinging irrelevant accusations are compensating for a lack of knowledge of the particular topic.</p> <p>Its easy to out gun me by attributing all sorts of positions to me. I explain why Hindus should fear living among a Muslim majority an all of a sudden I get self-righteous individuals condemning me for untouchability, brahminism, stealing land from poor squatters, widow-burning, etc.</p> <p>The arguments here are not xenophobic. I welcome immigration of Tibetans, Nepalese, and Bohra Muslims. Some immigration is bad for a country and some is good. Our argument is mainly that BDesh immigration is bad for India and for Hindus who make up most of India. Our evidence is offered above. Its easier to ignore those arguments and make irrelevant accusations.</p> <p>No one is arguing Hinduism is perfect and Islam is irredeemable. But Islam right now is fraught with pathologies that is causing non-Muslims lots of suffering. It is perfectly sensible for us to have concerns about massive Islamic immigration. That Hinduism also has problems does not make those concerns any less legitimate.</p> You are clearly outgunned here, buddy. You guys are generally older and in possession of an engineering or business degree (or, both). Doesn’t matter which one, but mainly it’s the lack of exposure to some humanities and social science courses.

Uhh actually I’m in my early 20s and I majored in religious studies.

What is it with people making all sorts of detailed comments on who I am and what I believe?

I suspect I am much more well-read than many here who get their perspective on Indian politics from Pankaj Mishra and the other PC authors they read in college. I actually read Hindutva literature, anti-Hindutva literature, Islamist literature, moderate Islamic literature, etc. Those who interpolate a whole set of beliefs from an argument on one topic and start flinging irrelevant accusations are compensating for a lack of knowledge of the particular topic.

Its easy to out gun me by attributing all sorts of positions to me. I explain why Hindus should fear living among a Muslim majority an all of a sudden I get self-righteous individuals condemning me for untouchability, brahminism, stealing land from poor squatters, widow-burning, etc.

The arguments here are not xenophobic. I welcome immigration of Tibetans, Nepalese, and Bohra Muslims. Some immigration is bad for a country and some is good. Our argument is mainly that BDesh immigration is bad for India and for Hindus who make up most of India. Our evidence is offered above. Its easier to ignore those arguments and make irrelevant accusations.

No one is arguing Hinduism is perfect and Islam is irredeemable. But Islam right now is fraught with pathologies that is causing non-Muslims lots of suffering. It is perfectly sensible for us to have concerns about massive Islamic immigration. That Hinduism also has problems does not make those concerns any less legitimate.

]]>
By: chachaji http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-6/#comment-183014 chachaji Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:07:39 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183014 <p>Caste is not an exclusively Hindu problem. In the South Asian context, Muslims, Sikhs, and Christians also have it, as a sociological reality of life, though to differing extents. Even in the solely Hindu context, caste is more a matter of a social stratification that results on a 'bottom-up' basis from a feudalistic society - than something that is implemented 'top-down' because of some scriptural sanction. And castes at the bottom <i>can</i> improve in their social status over time, so it is not always something that is carried on for generations altogether. And not surprizingly, the supposed existence of a 'hereditary caste system' and its weak correlation with skin color in India was also useful to European and other colonizers of India - in reinforcing their own hierarchical social order based on color.</p> <p>But all that said, caste <i>is</i> also relevant to the decision of at least some lower-caste Hindus to convert to Islam. <a href="http://specials.rediff.com/news/2006/sep/27sld2.htm">Here is a report</a> of the Meenakshipuram conversions in Tamil Nadu - 25 years after they happened, from Rediff Sep 2006.</p> <blockquote>"We converted as we were not respected by other caste Hindus. My name then was Uma Devan. We did not convert to Christianity because there is caste distinction in that religion too." Says Umar Qayam (former Uma Devan): "Now, as Muslims, we are respected. We have marriages taking place between us and other Muslims from Kadayanallur, Vadakarrai, Tenkasi, Achanpudhur and other places."</blockquote> Caste is not an exclusively Hindu problem. In the South Asian context, Muslims, Sikhs, and Christians also have it, as a sociological reality of life, though to differing extents. Even in the solely Hindu context, caste is more a matter of a social stratification that results on a ‘bottom-up’ basis from a feudalistic society – than something that is implemented ‘top-down’ because of some scriptural sanction. And castes at the bottom can improve in their social status over time, so it is not always something that is carried on for generations altogether. And not surprizingly, the supposed existence of a ‘hereditary caste system’ and its weak correlation with skin color in India was also useful to European and other colonizers of India – in reinforcing their own hierarchical social order based on color.

But all that said, caste is also relevant to the decision of at least some lower-caste Hindus to convert to Islam. Here is a report of the Meenakshipuram conversions in Tamil Nadu – 25 years after they happened, from Rediff Sep 2006.

“We converted as we were not respected by other caste Hindus. My name then was Uma Devan. We did not convert to Christianity because there is caste distinction in that religion too.” Says Umar Qayam (former Uma Devan): “Now, as Muslims, we are respected. We have marriages taking place between us and other Muslims from Kadayanallur, Vadakarrai, Tenkasi, Achanpudhur and other places.”
]]>
By: Arjun http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-5/#comment-183013 Arjun Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:57:30 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183013 <p>Gujjubhai, I have been banned for my comments on this thread. I'm posting from a different computer one last time. When free speech is smothered, people's concerns aren't heard and extremism grows, but of course, the people running SM can continue to live in their fantasy world watching world events go in an opposite direction.</p> <p>BTW, Modi seems to have another overwhelming victory in Gujarat for his govt's performance on developmental parameters. Celebration time for you, Gujjubhai :)!</p> Gujjubhai, I have been banned for my comments on this thread. I’m posting from a different computer one last time. When free speech is smothered, people’s concerns aren’t heard and extremism grows, but of course, the people running SM can continue to live in their fantasy world watching world events go in an opposite direction.

BTW, Modi seems to have another overwhelming victory in Gujarat for his govt’s performance on developmental parameters. Celebration time for you, Gujjubhai :) !

]]>
By: louiecypher http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-5/#comment-183012 louiecypher Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:55:29 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183012 <p>Krish**: Sorry bud, you don't have the mental acuity to distinguish between Hindutvaadis (i.e people who want a Hindu state) and people who have a concern over immigration from a country that is generally hostile to India. You might be younger, but our engineering & business degrees will translates into wealth which in turn will influence university chair endowments. You and your "progressive" friends, in quotes because you people consistently support illiberal policies like the Two Nation theory like the Hindutvaadis you claim to oppose, will have your day in the sun on campus but all this will end when you fail to get tenure because your ideas are a dime a dozen in South Asia departments. And as you continue to imply that I am a fascist, I will once again invite you to perform acts of onanism upon yourself</p> Krish**: Sorry bud, you don’t have the mental acuity to distinguish between Hindutvaadis (i.e people who want a Hindu state) and people who have a concern over immigration from a country that is generally hostile to India. You might be younger, but our engineering & business degrees will translates into wealth which in turn will influence university chair endowments. You and your “progressive” friends, in quotes because you people consistently support illiberal policies like the Two Nation theory like the Hindutvaadis you claim to oppose, will have your day in the sun on campus but all this will end when you fail to get tenure because your ideas are a dime a dozen in South Asia departments. And as you continue to imply that I am a fascist, I will once again invite you to perform acts of onanism upon yourself

]]>
By: Gujjubhai http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-5/#comment-183010 Gujjubhai Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:51:05 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183010 <p>Rahul@241 - well, the continued Hindu-hatred spewed by this troll in the comments section in many threads on SM also speaks volumes about the selective enforcement of commenting policy by the moderators of this website. I bet you that a rant that was even half as vituperative but directed against Islam or Xtianity would have earned the commenter a place in the purgatory of the banned right after the first post. Personally, it doesn't matter to me - I don't expect any better from the pseudo-seculars SouthAsiaWallahs running this website - but it does make it that much more difficult to follow the conversation. Many other thoughtful and articulate comments such as many on this thread are drowned in this cacophony.</p> <p>I am <em>seriously</em> disappointed by the moderators on this thread.</p> Rahul@241 – well, the continued Hindu-hatred spewed by this troll in the comments section in many threads on SM also speaks volumes about the selective enforcement of commenting policy by the moderators of this website. I bet you that a rant that was even half as vituperative but directed against Islam or Xtianity would have earned the commenter a place in the purgatory of the banned right after the first post. Personally, it doesn’t matter to me – I don’t expect any better from the pseudo-seculars SouthAsiaWallahs running this website – but it does make it that much more difficult to follow the conversation. Many other thoughtful and articulate comments such as many on this thread are drowned in this cacophony.

I am seriously disappointed by the moderators on this thread.

]]>
By: amber http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-5/#comment-183009 amber Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:47:36 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183009 <p>People interested in analyzing the BJP appeal should look at the data on the "50-40" parliamentary districts. These are districts where Muslims constitute over 40% of the population, but where Hindus still have a slight majority. In some 80% of these districts, the BJP wins, <b>even in places where they have no base at all</b>, like Bihar.</p> People interested in analyzing the BJP appeal should look at the data on the “50-40″ parliamentary districts. These are districts where Muslims constitute over 40% of the population, but where Hindus still have a slight majority. In some 80% of these districts, the BJP wins, even in places where they have no base at all, like Bihar.

]]>
By: Rahul http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-5/#comment-183007 Rahul Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:39:09 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183007 <p>Akshay @245, get this straight. You are not progressive. You are "progressive". Apparently, pseudo-secularists like to discard scare quotes as easily as they have abandoned the poor, oppressed, downtrodden Hindus of India.</p> Akshay @245, get this straight. You are not progressive. You are “progressive”. Apparently, pseudo-secularists like to discard scare quotes as easily as they have abandoned the poor, oppressed, downtrodden Hindus of India.

]]>
By: Krish**** http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/12/14/our_vanity_is_m/comment-page-5/#comment-183006 Krish**** Mon, 17 Dec 2007 02:36:39 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4904#comment-183006 <p>JGandhi,</p> <p>I don't think you understood what I had to say. If what I said was truly for the American paradigm, then it would have said, "Black Poh-lees showin'-off fo da white KKKops".</p> <p>You are clearly outgunned here, buddy. You guys are generally older and in possession of an engineering or business degree (or, both). Doesn't matter which one, but mainly it's the lack of exposure to some humanities and social science courses. Like <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/15/world/asia/15india.html?_r=1&oref=slogin">these one's</a> being put in place in schools, to help children articulate a real understanding of India. They will articulate a very different view of India from people like JGandhi, Paramhansa, LouieCypher, et. al.</p> <p>It's sad. Compare this thread with the one on the deaths of the two students at LSU. The hit-counts of the threads reveal that people would much rather fight over these concerns, then deal with the here and now.</p> <p>Maybe it's the isolation and loneliness that people feel living as brown people in such a large, mostly unfriendy land.</p> <p>I was in Thailand. Most of the Thai elite also harbors similar hatred of their neighbors, the Burmese.</p> <p>The point is to rise up above the hatred. Is that such a difficult message to comprehend? I know some founding figures who went to their deaths believing in such principles.</p> <p>Some of you know that I'm from Fiji. The language I see used by ethnic nationalists against Indians in Fiji, is shockingly similar to that evoked by religious nationalists in India.</p> <p>It's just sad that so many of my peers are succombing to the blind rage of ethnic chauvanism and nationalism. Look at yourselves? It doesn't make you good people. You make ape-like gestures taunting players at cricket matches--further subjecting yourselves to international humiliation. We want to behave on a level that equates to European soccer hooliganry?</p> <p>This is the "Great Civilization"? Which produces minds that cannot rise above simple xenophobic sentiment?</p> JGandhi,

I don’t think you understood what I had to say. If what I said was truly for the American paradigm, then it would have said, “Black Poh-lees showin’-off fo da white KKKops”.

You are clearly outgunned here, buddy. You guys are generally older and in possession of an engineering or business degree (or, both). Doesn’t matter which one, but mainly it’s the lack of exposure to some humanities and social science courses. Like these one’s being put in place in schools, to help children articulate a real understanding of India. They will articulate a very different view of India from people like JGandhi, Paramhansa, LouieCypher, et. al.

It’s sad. Compare this thread with the one on the deaths of the two students at LSU. The hit-counts of the threads reveal that people would much rather fight over these concerns, then deal with the here and now.

Maybe it’s the isolation and loneliness that people feel living as brown people in such a large, mostly unfriendy land.

I was in Thailand. Most of the Thai elite also harbors similar hatred of their neighbors, the Burmese.

The point is to rise up above the hatred. Is that such a difficult message to comprehend? I know some founding figures who went to their deaths believing in such principles.

Some of you know that I’m from Fiji. The language I see used by ethnic nationalists against Indians in Fiji, is shockingly similar to that evoked by religious nationalists in India.

It’s just sad that so many of my peers are succombing to the blind rage of ethnic chauvanism and nationalism. Look at yourselves? It doesn’t make you good people. You make ape-like gestures taunting players at cricket matches–further subjecting yourselves to international humiliation. We want to behave on a level that equates to European soccer hooliganry?

This is the “Great Civilization”? Which produces minds that cannot rise above simple xenophobic sentiment?

]]>