Comments on: Preserving the Evidence http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: brown http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175311 brown Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:43:05 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175311 <p>I wish this smart lady was helping her dad in many ways. Her talent, analytical skills and ideas can be used in the growing world which needs direction and effective leaders</p> I wish this smart lady was helping her dad in many ways. Her talent, analytical skills and ideas can be used in the growing world which needs direction and effective leaders

]]>
By: Indian http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175286 Indian Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:51:53 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175286 <p>dingchak, Jasmine,</p> <p>You risk getting into Abhi's hair. Assuming he has any.</p> dingchak, Jasmine,

You risk getting into Abhi’s hair. Assuming he has any.

]]>
By: dingchak http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175110 dingchak Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:25:56 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175110 <blockquote> 63 · Jasmine on October 29, 2007 06:44 PM · Direct link I don't like Jameel's hair. </blockquote> <p>WHaaa! have you seen' Jindal's hair??</p> <p>sorry.</p> 63 · Jasmine on October 29, 2007 06:44 PM · Direct link I don’t like Jameel’s hair.

WHaaa! have you seen’ Jindal’s hair??

sorry.

]]>
By: Vikram http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175051 Vikram Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:18:51 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175051 <blockquote> I don't give a f*ck about other threads or topics. I don't write every post on this site nor do I moderate or even read them all. </blockquote> <p>Ok fair enough. I thought the implication in your comment about why people disliked Jindal was that you were familiar with that thread.</p> I don’t give a f*ck about other threads or topics. I don’t write every post on this site nor do I moderate or even read them all.

Ok fair enough. I thought the implication in your comment about why people disliked Jindal was that you were familiar with that thread.

]]>
By: Abhi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175049 Abhi Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:03:28 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175049 <p>For the last time. I don't give a f*ck about other threads or topics. I don't write every post on this site nor do I moderate or even read them all. I do write my posts however and this one is about Singh, Jaffer, the ACLU and torture. It isn't a place for you to grind your axe on other issues.</p> For the last time. I don’t give a f*ck about other threads or topics. I don’t write every post on this site nor do I moderate or even read them all. I do write my posts however and this one is about Singh, Jaffer, the ACLU and torture. It isn’t a place for you to grind your axe on other issues.

]]>
By: Vikram http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175047 Vikram Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:53:25 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175047 <blockquote> The people who dislike Jindal dislike him explicitly for his policies.It has nothing to do with his family like you posit. </blockquote> <p>Oh ? Perhaps you can tell me what this sampling of comments from the Jindal thread mean:</p> <p>[deleted by admin]</p> The people who dislike Jindal dislike him explicitly for his policies.It has nothing to do with his family like you posit.

Oh ? Perhaps you can tell me what this sampling of comments from the Jindal thread mean:

[deleted by admin]

]]>
By: Abhi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175042 Abhi Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:21:00 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175042 <blockquote>And all of this inhibits his ability to reform Louisiana - how?</blockquote> <p>How the hell can you expect Louisiana residents to reform Louisiana (particularly the woefully inept education system) if their new governor thinks it is ok that they are taught creationism in school?</p> <p>Don't even answer that. All this is serving to do is further confuse this issue and take away from the original post. This post is <b>not</b> about Jindal. It is about criminal torture by the U.S. govt.</p> And all of this inhibits his ability to reform Louisiana – how?

How the hell can you expect Louisiana residents to reform Louisiana (particularly the woefully inept education system) if their new governor thinks it is ok that they are taught creationism in school?

Don’t even answer that. All this is serving to do is further confuse this issue and take away from the original post. This post is not about Jindal. It is about criminal torture by the U.S. govt.

]]>
By: KXB http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175041 KXB Tue, 30 Oct 2007 02:14:49 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175041 <p><i>The people who dislike Jindal dislike him explicitly for his policies. He is anti-evolution, anti-abortion, and pro-ten commandments in government buildings</i></p> <p>And all of this inhibits his ability to reform Louisiana - how? While he may personally hold the positions you say, he has not been pushing these positions awfully hard, nor is there any polling data that shows these were what Louisiana voters had in mind when voting for him.</p> <p>Pose the same questions to Ms. Singh - suppose she were anti-abortion (a position not unheard of among immigrant Indian women), would that make her criticism of Bush's policies on torture less damning?</p> The people who dislike Jindal dislike him explicitly for his policies. He is anti-evolution, anti-abortion, and pro-ten commandments in government buildings

And all of this inhibits his ability to reform Louisiana – how? While he may personally hold the positions you say, he has not been pushing these positions awfully hard, nor is there any polling data that shows these were what Louisiana voters had in mind when voting for him.

Pose the same questions to Ms. Singh – suppose she were anti-abortion (a position not unheard of among immigrant Indian women), would that make her criticism of Bush’s policies on torture less damning?

]]>
By: melbourne desi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175039 melbourne desi Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:52:32 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175039 <blockquote>There's no such thing as #2, fool. Every person is an individual. Only an idiot judges other people by the actions of their family. See: law. See also: common sense</blockquote> <p>So blinded by your fury that you targeted the wrong person. I made the comment about (1) and (2).</p> <p>A minimal understanding of human society will show that position (2) is valid. Position(2) may not be true in your frame of reference but that does not mean that it is wrong. Your ignorance of human society outside of USA is scary.</p> <blockquote>Only an idiot judges other people by the actions of their family.</blockquote> <p>That would make a large % of the human population idiots.</p> There’s no such thing as #2, fool. Every person is an individual. Only an idiot judges other people by the actions of their family. See: law. See also: common sense

So blinded by your fury that you targeted the wrong person. I made the comment about (1) and (2).

A minimal understanding of human society will show that position (2) is valid. Position(2) may not be true in your frame of reference but that does not mean that it is wrong. Your ignorance of human society outside of USA is scary.

Only an idiot judges other people by the actions of their family.

That would make a large % of the human population idiots.

]]>
By: Abhi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/10/28/preserving_the/comment-page-2/#comment-175038 Abhi Tue, 30 Oct 2007 01:48:38 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4819#comment-175038 <blockquote>The point was that nobody viewed Jindal as an individual. Rather all his actions were viewed through the lens of his religion, culture and his family and even meaningless details like his children's names.</blockquote> <p>BS Vikram. The people who dislike Jindal dislike him explicitly for <b>his policies</b>. He is anti-evolution, anti-abortion, and pro-ten commandments in government buildings. All of those things have a DIRECT effect on his constituents (and the nation through his former participation in Congress). It has nothing to do with his family like you posit. There are plenty of Christians in America who don't believe it is ok to teach bunk creationism in class. That is why your red herring of an argument has myself and others seeing red. They don't make any sense.</p> The point was that nobody viewed Jindal as an individual. Rather all his actions were viewed through the lens of his religion, culture and his family and even meaningless details like his children’s names.

BS Vikram. The people who dislike Jindal dislike him explicitly for his policies. He is anti-evolution, anti-abortion, and pro-ten commandments in government buildings. All of those things have a DIRECT effect on his constituents (and the nation through his former participation in Congress). It has nothing to do with his family like you posit. There are plenty of Christians in America who don’t believe it is ok to teach bunk creationism in class. That is why your red herring of an argument has myself and others seeing red. They don’t make any sense.

]]>