Comments on: It’s a nice day for a white (brown) wedding http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Accidental Enlightenment http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152667 Accidental Enlightenment Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:46:59 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152667 <p>bess - yes, that was generally what i meant.</p> <p>going point about why shouldn't the father be around more... without having gone through child-raising myself, it seems like very a big challenge to raise a family that's really connected to each other, without at least one parent dedicating him or herself full time to it - at least when there are multiple children involved and they are young. almost all dual career families i see either had a nanny or other caregiver (a.k.a. naniji/dadiji - grandparent) around almost full time to take care of the kids, so to speak. and the kids raised by a non-parent have conflicted emotions about whether they feel closer to that caregiver or the person who's genetic material they're actually carrying around.</p> <p>the onus has traditionally been on the mother to stay at home... and statistically speaking more women are more open to making career sacrifices in order to have greater involvement with their families. a lot more men are as well, and there are all sorts of blends coming up with how parents are doing re: work-life balance, etc. but it's still skewed to the female half.</p> <p>perhaps this is post is dead so hopefully this topic will come up another time. i still think a lot of what HMF and Amitabh et al are saying prenup prenup prenup is kinda weird. i've never heard of any indian person openly getting one! do you think priya sachdev and vikram chatwal did? i can't think of other desi examples where one spouse has much more than the other... but i just haven't heard of it, even among really, really financially successful family and friends who married much less successful spouses. i don't even know who's brought it up...</p> bess – yes, that was generally what i meant.

going point about why shouldn’t the father be around more… without having gone through child-raising myself, it seems like very a big challenge to raise a family that’s really connected to each other, without at least one parent dedicating him or herself full time to it – at least when there are multiple children involved and they are young. almost all dual career families i see either had a nanny or other caregiver (a.k.a. naniji/dadiji – grandparent) around almost full time to take care of the kids, so to speak. and the kids raised by a non-parent have conflicted emotions about whether they feel closer to that caregiver or the person who’s genetic material they’re actually carrying around.

the onus has traditionally been on the mother to stay at home… and statistically speaking more women are more open to making career sacrifices in order to have greater involvement with their families. a lot more men are as well, and there are all sorts of blends coming up with how parents are doing re: work-life balance, etc. but it’s still skewed to the female half.

perhaps this is post is dead so hopefully this topic will come up another time. i still think a lot of what HMF and Amitabh et al are saying prenup prenup prenup is kinda weird. i’ve never heard of any indian person openly getting one! do you think priya sachdev and vikram chatwal did? i can’t think of other desi examples where one spouse has much more than the other… but i just haven’t heard of it, even among really, really financially successful family and friends who married much less successful spouses. i don’t even know who’s brought it up…

]]>
By: Sugar nips http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152636 Sugar nips Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:03:45 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152636 <p>I think HMF is looking for a feminist sugar momma.</p> I think HMF is looking for a feminist sugar momma.

]]>
By: HMF http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152635 HMF Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:00:58 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152635 <p>same with</p> <p>MC Hammer --> Hammer</p> <p>and</p> <p>Legion of Doom --> LOD</p> same with

MC Hammer –> Hammer

and

Legion of Doom –> LOD

]]>
By: ak http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152633 ak Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:40:08 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152633 <p>fyi - i was just watching E! true hollywood story (it's so unnecessarily dramatic - i love it!) and apparently the official switch by the band to NKOTB was not for the sake of an acronym, or to save time; it was for an image change, in the face of competition from hip-hop and rap musicians.</p> fyi – i was just watching E! true hollywood story (it’s so unnecessarily dramatic – i love it!) and apparently the official switch by the band to NKOTB was not for the sake of an acronym, or to save time; it was for an image change, in the face of competition from hip-hop and rap musicians.

]]>
By: HMF http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152632 HMF Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:32:17 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152632 <p>JOAT:</p> <p>as everyone here has offered congrats, I will do the same. although, this announcement seems to correlate with your new monicker JOAT instead of the full expansion. Wedding planning doesn't leave you that much time to type out the full name I take it. Either that or you've chosen the well traveled path many entertainers have in the past:</p> <p>New Kids on the Block = NKOTB Puff Daddy = P diddy Prince = the symbol thing</p> JOAT:

as everyone here has offered congrats, I will do the same. although, this announcement seems to correlate with your new monicker JOAT instead of the full expansion. Wedding planning doesn’t leave you that much time to type out the full name I take it. Either that or you’ve chosen the well traveled path many entertainers have in the past:

New Kids on the Block = NKOTB Puff Daddy = P diddy Prince = the symbol thing

]]>
By: Runa http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152631 Runa Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:32:15 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152631 <p>Amitabh # 274, Ah-ha! I did wonder about that because it definitely was NOT your style :-)</p> Amitabh # 274, Ah-ha! I did wonder about that because it definitely was NOT your style :-)

]]>
By: SM Intern http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152630 SM Intern Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:29:27 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152630 <blockquote>#257 is not me, the usual Amitabh who comments here.</blockquote> <p>Correct. Three strikes maketh a troll. Banned and deleted.</p> #257 is not me, the usual Amitabh who comments here.

Correct. Three strikes maketh a troll. Banned and deleted.

]]>
By: Amitabh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152626 Amitabh Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:19:46 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152626 <h1>257 is not <b>me</b>, the usual Amitabh who comments here.</h1> 257 is not me, the usual Amitabh who comments here.]]> By: ak http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152624 ak Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:05:50 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152624 <p>yay, bess! it was getting a bit lonely in OL. bess, thank you for that articulation.</p> <p>JOAT, husband is clearly associated with marriage, and while i might have to go through with a marriage in form, i am uncomfortable that i be called a wife, or my partner a husband, since all of these link back to notions associated with marriage. if there were no social connotations associated, that's fine. but until now, partner is the only word that comes closes to describing what sort of relationship i want. though i can see this becoming a problem - if we do get married by law, sometimes i will have to refer to him as my husband, and i can see myself doing that rather begrudgingly and sarcastically :)</p> <p>HMF, glad it is clear. but it's also not - i see your point. this thread has made it very clear what i have in store if/when i have that committed relationship. as for your notion of marriage - i would agree somewhat. and i have nothing against it - it just irritates me that other forms are not given the same respect, or even recognition.</p> yay, bess! it was getting a bit lonely in OL. bess, thank you for that articulation.

JOAT, husband is clearly associated with marriage, and while i might have to go through with a marriage in form, i am uncomfortable that i be called a wife, or my partner a husband, since all of these link back to notions associated with marriage. if there were no social connotations associated, that’s fine. but until now, partner is the only word that comes closes to describing what sort of relationship i want. though i can see this becoming a problem – if we do get married by law, sometimes i will have to refer to him as my husband, and i can see myself doing that rather begrudgingly and sarcastically :)

HMF, glad it is clear. but it’s also not – i see your point. this thread has made it very clear what i have in store if/when i have that committed relationship. as for your notion of marriage – i would agree somewhat. and i have nothing against it – it just irritates me that other forms are not given the same respect, or even recognition.

]]>
By: HMF http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/07/24/its_a_nice_day/comment-page-6/#comment-152622 HMF Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:58:27 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4599#comment-152622 <p>Ok Ak, I get it, when you say form you mean the "social sanction" component. But to me, that's really all that a marriage is (or should be - it definitely shouldn't be a 'kick in the ass' that forces people to say "well this is the person I'm with, better make the best of it" as it so often is done in the Indian context).</p> Ok Ak, I get it, when you say form you mean the “social sanction” component. But to me, that’s really all that a marriage is (or should be – it definitely shouldn’t be a ‘kick in the ass’ that forces people to say “well this is the person I’m with, better make the best of it” as it so often is done in the Indian context).

]]>