At the same time, I am sad and ashamed to know that a lot of Indians born and raised in the US could still be so biased and racist in their remarks. I have been reading SP for a few days, and I can’t tell the no. of times I have come across words like “kala”, “gora”, “whities”, “ghetto dwellers” while describing others, and at the same time highlight the “India Shining” “we earn lots”, “We’re educated” lines. I think some respect for people of other races (whether they acn hear you or not/whther they read your words or not) and a little humility will go a long way. After all, wealth and education is not synomymous to decency, just like it’s not in this couple’s and their children’s case.

Lastly, for those condoning Indian child slave labor with reasonings like “500 teenagers die in US every year at their work places”, “US had slavery 150 years ago” are so lame. Those “500″/year (which is a staggering no) are of legal age to work. Teenagers, Ok, but 16 is okay to work and they are doing so out of their consent. They can leave anytime they don’t want to, and NOTE: they are paid prevailing wages. And oh yes, the slavery in US “150 years” ago is so relevant, like you’re admitting that India is 150 years behind US.

Bottom line is love your country of origin, but don’t let it become your sole identity that you have defend its wrongs.

Umm.. the truth?

Just deal with the fact that you did make a “huge fool” out of yourself with such impressively “human being like discussion”

I have. It seems like you can’t.

You really are hopeless. Whats the point of including an irrelevant, absurd remark whose only purpose was an idiotic attempt to save face? That remark does not even make any sense. You stupidly mangled future tense with past tense.

Just deal with the fact that you did make a “huge fool” out of yourself with such impressively “human being like discussion” as : “what the f*ck is “condemnation” going to do…….. America didn’t give a flying #()$@# what the rest of the world thought” and then finding out that you were completely clueless after all

Honesty, as in quoting completely, without the use of ellipses, to alter the subtext of the quote? You can’t make this kind of irony up:

“You’re absolutely correct, the moment I decided to engage you (assuming you’re capable of human being like discussion) I had a made a huge fool of me. Silly Rabbit. Trix are for kids.”

I am not arguing.

(2) I’m suggesting that there is, in fact, not a huge disconnect between what the Court does in fact and what the Court is supposed to do. The empirical evidence tends to bear that out too, especially if you extend observation out to all appellate courts in general, and not just the US Supreme Court.

hema: you can stuff your sorries in a sack. I wasn’t actually wrong about the procedural due process issue, and certainly nothing on the level of stupendously wrong.

acfd: Oh really! Now you say you were not wrong. I digged up your email. This is what you said to me at the end of the email: At any rate, in conclusion, you are right, I am wrong. Mea culpa and all that other good stuff. It’s a good thing I don’t practice constitutional law! -hema

hema: I was just being nice in my e-mail…ending the discussion quickly and painlessly. In truth, I don’t believe I was “stupendously” wrong. That’s it. You can trot that same e-mail out over and over again, and I’ll just keep saying the same thing.

acfd: I figured that airing this in public will embarass you but I guess I was wrong. Apparently, you just admitted to being wrong because you are nice.

LOL. She really should be embarrassed. Its thick-skinned, ignorant hucksters like her who give lawyering a bad name.

VERY.

Ok, SM Intern wants me to get a room for you. So I am going to go book a room at Motel 6.