Ridiculous. There are no references in any shastra, either Puranic or Itihasa like the Mahabharat, wherein Krishna is described as having any kind of homosexual relationship.

However, what you will find is the concept of “gopi bhav”, wherein saints and sages throughout the ages (both male and female) aspire to serve Krishna in an amorous relationship upon the death of their material bodies, liberation of their soul (jeevs are prakruti, or feminine in nature), and the attainment of a spiritual body in the eternal world. That body would be a female one in order to engage in the madhurya-rasa, or the amorous relationship of Lover and Beloved with the Deity Krishna. One cannot engage in the amorous relationship in a male form with a male Deity, hence, the death of the material body and the birth of the spiritual (female) one.

One who has read even a little bit of “krishna lore” knows this.

It’s a tradition in some regions of India for the husband to give a “new” name to the wife soon after marriage.

It’s to signify a new identity as a wife.

So, according to you, all gay kids born in heterosexual households have ‘a problem’?

No. Seeing the affection between their parents teaches them how to behave with their own future partners.

Arjuna was not male at that time but female – a different person. I don’t see any homosexuality there.

Find a reference where two men in male forms or two women in female forms are getting it on…. then you might have a case.

Take into consideration the African influence in the Carribbean when looking for an answer to this.

Now that you mention it, I may have missed the rotations in my attempts to look oblivious….

Thank God it was kissing yoga and not tantric yoga.