Comments on: Behind the News at the Washington Times http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Ravi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120683 Ravi Tue, 06 Mar 2007 19:34:32 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120683 <p>Anyone read the series by that Julia b!!!!? Each article begins with some handpicked quote in sanskrit or from manu- to tar this as some unique cultural attribute. What a hachet job. If they were truly concerned about the suffering of women, it'd be one thing, but heck, this was just another bit to dump on those not sufficiently white. Perverts.</p> Anyone read the series by that Julia b!!!!? Each article begins with some handpicked quote in sanskrit or from manu- to tar this as some unique cultural attribute. What a hachet job. If they were truly concerned about the suffering of women, it’d be one thing, but heck, this was just another bit to dump on those not sufficiently white. Perverts.

]]>
By: Arjuna http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120581 Arjuna Tue, 06 Mar 2007 00:39:54 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120581 <p>"You're joking right ? Dharavi slum dwellers & piss poor BIMARU serfs churn out boys to lay waste to Pakistan ? That's not what Petra's post was suggesting. The point of the book is not that Indians & Chinese favor male children in order to meet expansionist goals, but rather that states fearing internal strife caused by unmarriagable males will prefer to expend this surplus testosterone abroad. "</p> <p>When I wrote 'wider level', I wasnt refering to the individuals involved, who are clearly not going to be thinking about such things when making the decision to abort. However, <u>Nature's</u> purpose behind this is indeed the laying waste of Pakistan, due to, as mentioned, the unmarriable males.</p> “You’re joking right ? Dharavi slum dwellers & piss poor BIMARU serfs churn out boys to lay waste to Pakistan ? That’s not what Petra’s post was suggesting. The point of the book is not that Indians & Chinese favor male children in order to meet expansionist goals, but rather that states fearing internal strife caused by unmarriagable males will prefer to expend this surplus testosterone abroad. “

When I wrote ‘wider level’, I wasnt refering to the individuals involved, who are clearly not going to be thinking about such things when making the decision to abort. However, Nature’s purpose behind this is indeed the laying waste of Pakistan, due to, as mentioned, the unmarriable males.

]]>
By: louiecypher http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120478 louiecypher Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:51:05 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120478 <blockquote>Can you trust Archibald? He hasn\'t provided any proof on this issue yet, so it could be that theres some axe to grind.</blockquote> <p>True, but Fran Coomb's wife Marianne Kester Coombs is an "out" white nationalist who writes for VDARE & AMREN and is chummy with the BNP's Nick Griffin. Do we know for a fact that Mr. Coombs has made these comments ? No, but we do know he plays house with a racist. If you have any doubts about my claim, I invite you to read her essays & articles online. In case you are wondering, I lean right and am very sparing with the term "racist"</p> Can you trust Archibald? He hasn\’t provided any proof on this issue yet, so it could be that theres some axe to grind.

True, but Fran Coomb’s wife Marianne Kester Coombs is an “out” white nationalist who writes for VDARE & AMREN and is chummy with the BNP’s Nick Griffin. Do we know for a fact that Mr. Coombs has made these comments ? No, but we do know he plays house with a racist. If you have any doubts about my claim, I invite you to read her essays & articles online. In case you are wondering, I lean right and am very sparing with the term “racist”

]]>
By: Classical Liberal Warrior Against Terror http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120475 Classical Liberal Warrior Against Terror Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:22:16 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120475 <p>Can you trust Archibald? He hasn\'t provided any proof on this issue yet, so it could be that theres some axe to grind.</p> <p>Regarding the conservative-liberal issues:- <b>{1}</b><br> W is no liberal yet he went out of his way with in his own party on immigration, and will most likely attempt once more.</p> <p><b>{2}</b><br> To complicate issue many liberal constituencies African Americans, unions, Port Huron types(they aren\'t dead, anti globalization is their offspring and the \'dude\' is still active(relatively speaking he still is the dude) in that circle), etc are all against immigration.</p> <p>And this does not absolve India of having too many abortions. It still is an immoral act.</p> Can you trust Archibald? He hasn\’t provided any proof on this issue yet, so it could be that theres some axe to grind.

Regarding the conservative-liberal issues:- {1}
W is no liberal yet he went out of his way with in his own party on immigration, and will most likely attempt once more.

{2}
To complicate issue many liberal constituencies African Americans, unions, Port Huron types(they aren\’t dead, anti globalization is their offspring and the \’dude\’ is still active(relatively speaking he still is the dude) in that circle), etc are all against immigration.

And this does not absolve India of having too many abortions. It still is an immoral act.

]]>
By: louiecypher http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120443 louiecypher Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:57:21 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120443 <blockquote>like an earlier poster said, if you want the real reason (at a wider level) for this increase in aborted females, it is because an excess of males is needed to take care of one of india's problems. the excess indian males are not going to america to marry white women. theyll be marching west allright, but not close to american shores.</blockquote> <p>You're joking right ? Dharavi slum dwellers & piss poor BIMARU serfs churn out boys to lay waste to Pakistan ? That's not what Petra's post was suggesting. The point of the book is not that Indians & Chinese favor male children in order to meet expansionist goals, but rather that states fearing internal strife caused by unmarriagable males will prefer to expend this surplus testosterone abroad.</p> like an earlier poster said, if you want the real reason (at a wider level) for this increase in aborted females, it is because an excess of males is needed to take care of one of india’s problems. the excess indian males are not going to america to marry white women. theyll be marching west allright, but not close to american shores.

You’re joking right ? Dharavi slum dwellers & piss poor BIMARU serfs churn out boys to lay waste to Pakistan ? That’s not what Petra’s post was suggesting. The point of the book is not that Indians & Chinese favor male children in order to meet expansionist goals, but rather that states fearing internal strife caused by unmarriagable males will prefer to expend this surplus testosterone abroad.

]]>
By: Arjuna http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120441 Arjuna Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:15:16 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120441 <p>like an earlier poster said, if you want the real reason (at a wider level) for this increase in aborted females, it is because an excess of males is needed to take care of one of india's problems. the excess indian males are not going to america to marry white women. theyll be marching west allright, but not close to american shores.</p> like an earlier poster said, if you want the real reason (at a wider level) for this increase in aborted females, it is because an excess of males is needed to take care of one of india’s problems. the excess indian males are not going to america to marry white women. theyll be marching west allright, but not close to american shores.

]]>
By: louiecypher http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120427 louiecypher Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:23:32 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120427 <blockquote>Nothing wrong with giving the wonderful daughters (and sons) of America a choice between caramel and vanilla. You would think conservatives would support open markets </blockquote> <p>most people here are fair weather free marketeers. Contrast Lou Dobb's go-go 90's/pre-space.com countenance with his current "bug up the butt" mug. Free markets are best when India sticks to producing cheap cabana wear and sandalwood elephant pen caddys.</p> Nothing wrong with giving the wonderful daughters (and sons) of America a choice between caramel and vanilla. You would think conservatives would support open markets

most people here are fair weather free marketeers. Contrast Lou Dobb’s go-go 90′s/pre-space.com countenance with his current “bug up the butt” mug. Free markets are best when India sticks to producing cheap cabana wear and sandalwood elephant pen caddys.

]]>
By: rano http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120426 rano Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:44:03 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120426 <p>Nothing wrong with giving the wonderful daughters (and sons) of America a choice between caramel and vanilla. You would think conservatives would support open markets</p> Nothing wrong with giving the wonderful daughters (and sons) of America a choice between caramel and vanilla. You would think conservatives would support open markets

]]>
By: Steve-O http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120403 Steve-O Sat, 03 Mar 2007 07:44:59 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120403 <p>Manju-you're on the right track. Coombs' view on abortion is not meant for public consumption. Most of his readers are pro-life, so he's giving them what they want. If he were writing for a feminist audience he'd probably focus more on the gender angle. But he probably doesn't give a crap about abortion or women's rights. The issue here is miscegenation.</p> <p>Personally I have a tough time believing either Archibald or Coombs. They both worked for the Moonie newspaper.</p> <p>Archibald is telling us what Jones says that Coombs said. There is bad blood between Jones & Coombs. Was Jones trying to make Coombs look like an ass by ascribing the words "our girls" to Coombs? If so, mission accomplished.</p> Manju-you’re on the right track. Coombs’ view on abortion is not meant for public consumption. Most of his readers are pro-life, so he’s giving them what they want. If he were writing for a feminist audience he’d probably focus more on the gender angle. But he probably doesn’t give a crap about abortion or women’s rights. The issue here is miscegenation.

Personally I have a tough time believing either Archibald or Coombs. They both worked for the Moonie newspaper.

Archibald is telling us what Jones says that Coombs said. There is bad blood between Jones & Coombs. Was Jones trying to make Coombs look like an ass by ascribing the words “our girls” to Coombs? If so, mission accomplished.

]]>
By: Shruti http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2007/03/02/behind_the_news/comment-page-1/#comment-120399 Shruti Sat, 03 Mar 2007 05:39:27 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=4212#comment-120399 <blockquote>maybe archibald is confusing combs with margaret sanger.</blockquote> <p>HA!!</p> <p>Happy Friday night, Manju. Enjoy the brownie (points) you just got from me for that last comment.</p> maybe archibald is confusing combs with margaret sanger.

HA!!

Happy Friday night, Manju. Enjoy the brownie (points) you just got from me for that last comment.

]]>