Comments on: Capitalism: Gujus vs. Bengalis

By: www.min10

www.min10 — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:22:33 +0000

Dear member quizman, The actual and true story about Harshad Mehta can be seen here Harshad Mehta It has very beautifully described every bit of 1992 scam.

By: sanjay mundada

sanjay mundada — Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:19:55 +0000

Dear member quizman, The actual and true story about Harshad Mehta can be seen here Harshad Mehta It has very beautifully described every bit of 1992 scam.

By: Gaurav

Gaurav — Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:09:18 +0000

Gujaratis are not Only Good Business man/Industrialist but also very good People By nature.They have the attiude of adaption & Flexibility wich I have rarely seen in any Community other than Marwaris.Thats why they are more Sucessful.ujaratis make Punjabi/Soth indian/Thai/Marwari & marathi dishes at their home which is the Best Example.

Also they do lot of for their Respective Societies Like Jains in Gujaratis & Marwaris/Patels/Brahmins etc.. all Community Leader Play Poductive Role For their Respective as well general Communal growth.You will find lots of Trusts run by Gujaratis in the world which is the Best Example.

Gujaratis in Short are more money minded than Business who believe in Proseprity,Growth,Non violence & Productivity.

By: openyoureyes

openyoureyes — Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:36:41 +0000

to the truthseeker, considering per capita GDP of america as $25,000 how much does a modest house cost in the US? around $2,00,000 i guess. if per capita GDP of Gujarat is $600, the average price of a house in Gujarat is around $10,000. in that case, assuming all wages earned goes behind buying a house, it takes one 8 years to own a house in the US and about 17 years in Gujarat. does it imply Gujarat’s per capita GDP is around $12,500? People in the west earn in dollars and in dollars do they spend, there aint much difference.

By: SMit Kumar

SMit Kumar — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:53:34 +0000

Well, Lakshmi Mittal is a Marwari.

By: risible

risible — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 05:34:03 +0000

Buddhism certainly is far more humane and rational than brahminism. Buddha rejected brahminism, its cruel sacrifices, its unjust casteism, its absurd superstitions.

And yet its wiped off the face of India, sans the Mahars of Maharastra and a few whitened desis ashamed of the idolatrous profusion of deities. But then, for the micro-dicked race of dumbass brownz, its probably a fitting fate And by the way, even though we have short dicks, we have big tongues, so your claim that we are incapable of pleasuring our women is patently false. lick lick.

By: Vinay

Vinay — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 04:13:20 +0000

Here is the point you were making emphatically: "untouchability has been outlawed by the Indian constitution!".

Macacaroach!

By: truthseeker

truthseeker — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:48:37 +0000

Whats the point of passing all these laws when there is no will to enforce them? Hey, that was the point I brought up here.

Here is the point you were making emphatically: "untouchability has been outlawed by the Indian constitution!".

By: Vinay

Vinay — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:26:48 +0000

Just amazing. A nation of a billion souls with a large, stable government "doesn't have the means to enforce its laws"! Surely such a government has no right to exist then.

You got them brother! Would you like to raise an army and invade India? You can then rule over it with your wisdom.

A handful of brits managed to enforce their laws on 100s of millions of south asians, but the far greater number of native indian babus are utterly helpless. What "means" are they lacking that the British possessed, and that other nations also do?

I assume you have the answer and will unleash once you are the emperor of India?

Whats the point of passing all these laws when there is no will to enforce them?

Hey, that was the point I brought up here. What are you, a troll? Damn I have been feeding the trolls again!!

By: truthseeker

truthseeker — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 02:07:22 +0000

In present day India every individual is free to choose their professions. It may still be useful to see these professions as being labor, military, intellectual or business oriented like the four-fold varna ideal and to say that we need a healthy balance of those professions.

If the varna ideal was professionally based and indians today are free to choose their professions then why aren't all memebers of the military and government called Kshatriyas? Why aren't all businessmen called Vaishyas? Why aren't non-brahmins allowed to be temple priests? Why are brahmins who clean toilets still called brahmins rather than untouchables? And so on.

Well, untouchability has been outlawed by the Indian constitution!........India doesn't have the means to enforce its laws, there is a difference.

Just amazing. A nation of a billion souls with a large, stable government "doesn't have the means to enforce its laws"! Surely such a government has no right to exist then.

A handful of brits managed to enforce their laws on 100s of millions of south asians, but the far greater number of native indian babus are utterly helpless. What "means" are they lacking that the British possessed, and that other nations also do?

India has laws against child bonded labor as well, yet India to its shame is by far the world's worst offender of children's rights. Tens of millions of little children continue to work as bonded slaves in India, often in the most hazardous conditions. Whats the point of passing all these laws when there is no will to enforce them?