Well, it really make me feel good that a lots of people still are against violence by any means, well, I believe there is something wrong with our security establishment, they are to Islamic centric. Their way of working is almost 150 year old (practically), they are still to authorative in character and practice. Well before independence we were enslaved in police state, their are enumerable instance of police firing indiscriminately on Indian Masses, practically they were not answerable to any one (except Englishmen), there are instances of police firing on peacefully protesting mass, peasant, tribal….. List will include whole of country. The most dreaded evil of British India was their economic policy. It was complete loot, focused on keeping India in poorest state (regretting for repeating history). Now my Question is, how much we have changed our police after independence? They are still almost same, they still fire on peacefully protesting mass, in particular against Muslim community, as happened in Malegaon in 2001 highlighted by Sidharth, Police were particularly biased on Gujrat , in some instance they were involve in inciting mob to violence, if you pay a brief look at the riots after independence, it will become clear that it start with small pity issues like, molestation, pig fight and anything and end up with police firing on innocent Muslim youth and children alike, why it is always that when police fire on Muslims it fire above waist ? Do any one believe that it fire for dispersing mob? Can a stone-pelting mob is such threat to professionally trained police that they fire on youth, child and women alike? We need to curb the power of police; they are negating the sprite, for which our forefatherÂ’s have fought for Independence from Raj.

As highlighted after blast there is lack of basic facility, like Hospital, water, sanitation, community play ground, Community Park, Schools, colleges in every city and state of India where there is a concentration of Muslim population. Our leaders have pretty excuse and non-committed promise, what is difference between Raj exploitation and ignorance of Indian masses and independent IndiaÂ’s neglect and falls promise of national and state leaders. Do we not feel ashamed when we say that Muslim masses are more inclined toward terrorism? We do not open engineering colleges, hospitals in Muslim concentrated areas, MuslimÂ’s are still medieval ages, as per scientific and modern education is concerned, how can we expect them to behave in modern way?

These are some basic question we need to answer to ourselves. British Inda was their economic policy

brown should not kill brown.

sincere question: does that rule apply here for you as well?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5330832.stm

I don’t know if I understood you correctly, but do you mean to say killing a bunch of people is not evil, depending on the reason? Like, the ends justify the means?

For me, there are some acts that can be called evil ojectively. And killing people is one of them.

Venu