Comments on: FDA Takes Two Small Steps… http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Scott H Florance http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-225842 Scott H Florance Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:27:32 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-225842 <p>You can You can the see that Jimmy J Farnham from 2008 and 1971 was taken 51,216 years in the past the time girls scout cookies who said he stole the bioengeneered 28, mill is the death wooze rot ogf corupton that a an Air force gov of Alibama your misusing time travel.</p> You can You can the see that Jimmy J Farnham from 2008 and 1971 was taken 51,216 years in the past the time girls scout cookies who said he stole the bioengeneered 28, mill is the death wooze rot ogf corupton that a an Air force gov of Alibama your misusing time travel.

]]>
By: Scott H Florance http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-196782 Scott H Florance Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:01:44 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-196782 <p>The prison inmates arent useless any more. They should each be given a 'miraculas vial', they have the ability to talk to Angels and to ask them to materialize a small speck of healthy medication in the empty vial you give them. The prisoners will look closely inside their vials every morning to determine if they accummulated a tiny bit of chemical drug given to them by the Christian Angels. Give them a list of different types of drugs to request for, let them choose wich one drug type they will get manifested inside their vials. Then when it works you have a new drug to study and mass produce.</p> <p>Develop a small chip thats meant to be the spot where one molecule would be able to appear. First make a nano-box or nano-hole in the center of the chip where the single magic molecule might be found. Once this is done give one chip to each prisoner to put in the vile they each have.</p> The prison inmates arent useless any more. They should each be given a ‘miraculas vial’, they have the ability to talk to Angels and to ask them to materialize a small speck of healthy medication in the empty vial you give them. The prisoners will look closely inside their vials every morning to determine if they accummulated a tiny bit of chemical drug given to them by the Christian Angels. Give them a list of different types of drugs to request for, let them choose wich one drug type they will get manifested inside their vials. Then when it works you have a new drug to study and mass produce.

Develop a small chip thats meant to be the spot where one molecule would be able to appear. First make a nano-box or nano-hole in the center of the chip where the single magic molecule might be found. Once this is done give one chip to each prisoner to put in the vile they each have.

]]>
By: desishiksa http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-96361 desishiksa Wed, 25 Oct 2006 04:26:55 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-96361 <p>Pardesi Gori on August 28, 2006 06:30 PM · Direct link Some type of vaccine has been linked to autism in children, if my memory serves me correctly.</p> <p>I feel compelled to correct this misconception. The MMR vaccine was touted as the evil cause of autism for a while, but overwhelming evidence is against this theory. Futher information is available at <a href="http://[http://www.cdc.gov/nip/vacsafe/concerns/autism/autism-mmr.htm#2]">the CDC</a> where the studies are all summarized. This misconception leads to people not vaccinating their children against measles, mumps and rubella, at least one of which (measles) is potentially deadly. The people who insist on not vaccinating their kids because they are suspicious about the government or the health industry in general are relying on the fact that everyone else is vaccinating their kids to protect their unvaccinated children, i.e. herd immunity.</p> <p>This is just irresponsible and selfish.</p> <p>If no one vaccinated their kids, they could die of measles or end up deaf, blind or severely disabled. Because the overwhelming majority are vaccinated, the dissenters can stick to their guns with very minimal health risks to their own children. I just don't think this is fair and I can't let that kind of misinformation go uncorrected. I think parents have a responsibility not just to their own kids but to society at large to vaccinate their children. Yes, new medical treatments sometimes have side effects that are unanticipated. But the MMR is not a new vaccine, and this issue has been extensively studied.</p> Pardesi Gori on August 28, 2006 06:30 PM · Direct link Some type of vaccine has been linked to autism in children, if my memory serves me correctly.

I feel compelled to correct this misconception. The MMR vaccine was touted as the evil cause of autism for a while, but overwhelming evidence is against this theory. Futher information is available at the CDC where the studies are all summarized. This misconception leads to people not vaccinating their children against measles, mumps and rubella, at least one of which (measles) is potentially deadly. The people who insist on not vaccinating their kids because they are suspicious about the government or the health industry in general are relying on the fact that everyone else is vaccinating their kids to protect their unvaccinated children, i.e. herd immunity.

This is just irresponsible and selfish.

If no one vaccinated their kids, they could die of measles or end up deaf, blind or severely disabled. Because the overwhelming majority are vaccinated, the dissenters can stick to their guns with very minimal health risks to their own children. I just don’t think this is fair and I can’t let that kind of misinformation go uncorrected. I think parents have a responsibility not just to their own kids but to society at large to vaccinate their children. Yes, new medical treatments sometimes have side effects that are unanticipated. But the MMR is not a new vaccine, and this issue has been extensively studied.

]]>
By: I lowe it the accent http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-87225 I lowe it the accent Fri, 15 Sep 2006 21:34:08 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-87225 <p>I think like all vaccinations, all children (boys and girls) should be required to get the shot. because it is the only way the virus will eventually be wiped out, just like polio etc is virtually nonexistant in the western world :)</p> I think like all vaccinations, all children (boys and girls) should be required to get the shot. because it is the only way the virus will eventually be wiped out, just like polio etc is virtually nonexistant in the western world :)

]]>
By: chick pea http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-86778 chick pea Thu, 14 Sep 2006 20:22:44 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-86778 <p>michigan <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/HEALTH/conditions/09/13/hpv.vaccine.ap/index.html">may REQUIRE girls </a>in 6th grade to get the vaccine... disucss...</p> michigan may REQUIRE girls in 6th grade to get the vaccine… disucss…

]]>
By: chick pea http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-83598 chick pea Thu, 31 Aug 2006 07:57:21 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-83598 <p>for your interest <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/29/health/29hpv.html?_r=1&ref=science&oref=slogin">a nyt article </a>about the vaccine.</p> for your interest a nyt article about the vaccine.

]]>
By: 酒精润版辊 http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-83306 酒精润版辊 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:48:45 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-83306 <p><a href="http://www.hcjg.com">印刷胶辊</a> <a href="http://www.hcjg.com">不锈钢辊</a> <a href="http://www.hcjg.com">印刷机械配件</a> <a href="http://www.hcjg.com">尼龙辊</a> <a href="http://www.hcjg.com">酒精润版辊</a></p> 印刷胶辊 不锈钢辊 印刷机械配件 尼龙辊 酒精润版辊

]]>
By: Pardesi Gori http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-83196 Pardesi Gori Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:02:04 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-83196 <p>Screwed and Chick Pea, I have noticed in every country I've gone to, the onus is on women much more than men. Is it perhaps because men have proven themselves consistently less open than women are to things like testing and getting examined? Are women more open towards using contraceptives then men are? I just got my answer here...</p> <p>http://www.alternet.org/story/17432/</p> <p>... talks about RISUG, birth control injection for men...</p> <p>"The injection is called Reversible Inhibition of Sperm Under Guidance (RISUG, pronounced RICE-ugh). It was developed by professor Sujoy K. Guha, an Indian researcher of biomedical engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology. Guha has tested RISUG on men for more than 25 years with successful results. His research has drawn praise from the World Health Organization, as well as doctors from around the world. Pharmaceutical companies in India and Egypt are vying to buy RISUG, and, if all continues well with Guha's research, RISUG will be available on the Indian market sometime within the next few years."</p> <p>I always wondered why a male birth control pill had not been invented and mass marketed all these years. Why is the onus always on the woman, up until recently (still the future)?</p> <p>Birth control pills and injections targeted towards women have side effects. Why in this day and age are women still targets, while men are not?</p> <p>More over, in India it has been reported that social workers do mass propaganda towards poor uneducated village women regarding birth control measures like pills or injections and they do not inform them of the possible grave side effects. All of the possible side effects of the current injection for women are not even known. Again, these women partake of these things in full faith. In a way it's kind of taking advantage of their innocence.</p> Screwed and Chick Pea, I have noticed in every country I’ve gone to, the onus is on women much more than men. Is it perhaps because men have proven themselves consistently less open than women are to things like testing and getting examined? Are women more open towards using contraceptives then men are? I just got my answer here…

http://www.alternet.org/story/17432/

… talks about RISUG, birth control injection for men…

“The injection is called Reversible Inhibition of Sperm Under Guidance (RISUG, pronounced RICE-ugh). It was developed by professor Sujoy K. Guha, an Indian researcher of biomedical engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology. Guha has tested RISUG on men for more than 25 years with successful results. His research has drawn praise from the World Health Organization, as well as doctors from around the world. Pharmaceutical companies in India and Egypt are vying to buy RISUG, and, if all continues well with Guha’s research, RISUG will be available on the Indian market sometime within the next few years.”

I always wondered why a male birth control pill had not been invented and mass marketed all these years. Why is the onus always on the woman, up until recently (still the future)?

Birth control pills and injections targeted towards women have side effects. Why in this day and age are women still targets, while men are not?

More over, in India it has been reported that social workers do mass propaganda towards poor uneducated village women regarding birth control measures like pills or injections and they do not inform them of the possible grave side effects. All of the possible side effects of the current injection for women are not even known. Again, these women partake of these things in full faith. In a way it’s kind of taking advantage of their innocence.

]]>
By: Dahlia Sen http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-83039 Dahlia Sen Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:31:58 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-83039 <p>It's not just desi parents with backward/ludicrous attitudes about STD prevention, read this in the <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/08/25/MNGCJKP5T41.DTL">San Fran Chronicle</a> about FDA's own Janet Woodcock's reasoning for barring OTC access to Plan B:</p> <blockquote> So that's the new theory: With a morning-after pill available, kids will be having sex willy-nilly. In fact, during the three-year delay for FDA approval, a deputy FDA commissioner, Dr. Janet Woodcock, reportedly said that she feared Plan B would "lead adolescents to form sex-based cults.''</blockquote> It’s not just desi parents with backward/ludicrous attitudes about STD prevention, read this in the San Fran Chronicle about FDA’s own Janet Woodcock’s reasoning for barring OTC access to Plan B:

So that’s the new theory: With a morning-after pill available, kids will be having sex willy-nilly. In fact, during the three-year delay for FDA approval, a deputy FDA commissioner, Dr. Janet Woodcock, reportedly said that she feared Plan B would “lead adolescents to form sex-based cults.”
]]>
By: chick pea http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/08/28/fda_takes_two_s/comment-page-1/#comment-82876 chick pea Tue, 29 Aug 2006 03:23:42 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3730#comment-82876 <p>men are not regularly tested for hpv..it is placed as a woman's responsibility... not saying it's fair, but that is the way it is.. hopefully most people are informed and aware of the possible consequences...<b>nobody is immune to anything these days</b>..whether it be hiv, hpv, other std's, cancer, etc...</p> men are not regularly tested for hpv..it is placed as a woman’s responsibility… not saying it’s fair, but that is the way it is.. hopefully most people are informed and aware of the possible consequences…nobody is immune to anything these days..whether it be hiv, hpv, other std’s, cancer, etc…

]]>