Comments on: Silencing the “Code” http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Zahid http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-69103 Zahid Wed, 21 Jun 2006 09:03:52 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-69103 <p>I recently read the book and seriously didn't find anything that would bother anyone. Dan brown is brilliant in the book with mixing facts with fiction which is basically his own point of view and last time i checked, it said on the cover that its a NOVEL.</p> <p>Being a muslim this really reminds me of Salman Rushdie's Satani Verses, even that was a novel where he used islamic personality and created a world where things that happened were his brain's creation.</p> <p>As far as i know, anything that challenges the religious scripture, even if its an isolated view, its considered offensive.</p> I recently read the book and seriously didn’t find anything that would bother anyone. Dan brown is brilliant in the book with mixing facts with fiction which is basically his own point of view and last time i checked, it said on the cover that its a NOVEL.

Being a muslim this really reminds me of Salman Rushdie’s Satani Verses, even that was a novel where he used islamic personality and created a world where things that happened were his brain’s creation.

As far as i know, anything that challenges the religious scripture, even if its an isolated view, its considered offensive.

]]>
By: Topcat http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66581 Topcat Wed, 07 Jun 2006 05:02:26 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66581 <p>I didnt find anything offensive with the book. Probably coz I am not a christian or probably I seek logic and reason behind myths and my logic says Krishna, buddha, Jesus Christ, Sai Baba were all humans, only more enlightened.</p> I didnt find anything offensive with the book. Probably coz I am not a christian or probably I seek logic and reason behind myths and my logic says Krishna, buddha, Jesus Christ, Sai Baba were all humans, only more enlightened.

]]>
By: SP http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66367 SP Tue, 06 Jun 2006 16:10:48 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66367 <p>Read this interesting article on the banning of the Code in Punjab. Priceless quote:</p> <p>"Ashok Sharma, joint secretary of the Northern Indian Motion Pictures Distributors' Association, told Outlook, "Except for the soft-porn variety,there isn't much demand for English movies in Punjab. No cinema hall in Punjab had approached us for The Da Vinci Code. So, ban or no ban, it wasn't going to be shown in Punjab."</p> <p>http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20060612&fname=Punjab+DA+Vinci+%28F%29&sid=1</p> Read this interesting article on the banning of the Code in Punjab. Priceless quote:

“Ashok Sharma, joint secretary of the Northern Indian Motion Pictures Distributors’ Association, told Outlook, “Except for the soft-porn variety,there isn’t much demand for English movies in Punjab. No cinema hall in Punjab had approached us for The Da Vinci Code. So, ban or no ban, it wasn’t going to be shown in Punjab.”

http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20060612&fname=Punjab+DA+Vinci+%28F%29&sid=1

]]>
By: Pardeshi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66251 Pardeshi Mon, 05 Jun 2006 22:05:15 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66251 <p>"Other types of secularism are religion-indifferent secularism (United States), and anti-religion secularism (maybe France). I think the American model is best."</p> <p>The French secularism or laicité is something else than what you suggest. To have a clearer view you may look up the link http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A2903663</p> “Other types of secularism are religion-indifferent secularism (United States), and anti-religion secularism (maybe France). I think the American model is best.”

The French secularism or laicité is something else than what you suggest. To have a clearer view you may look up the link http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A2903663

]]>
By: Jeet http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66188 Jeet Mon, 05 Jun 2006 19:00:08 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66188 <p>There was a problem with multiplex owners and Yashraj distributors but it was <a href="http://www.ibnlive.com/news/fanaa-ready-for-multiplex-release/11440-8.html">solved</a></p> <p>Aamir is for the displaced people to get<a href="http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=68417"> rehabilitated</a> and so is the SC, so i dont know where the problem is.</p> <blockquote> Was Aamir Khan right in his views? And did he do the right thing by coming out in the open or was he doing this for publicity? One can go on debating. What is important to note is that Aamir Khan never really opposed the raising of the level of the dam. He just spoke for the proper rehabilitation of the people affected in the process. This is also the concern, not just of the NBAÂ’s prime mover Medha Patkar, but also of the Supreme Court. Then why does the youth wing of the BJP have a problem with Aamir Khan? Could it be that the party has run out of issues to protest on and had been out of the news for too long? </blockquote> <p>Just because he voiced his opinions, the politicians should tear his movie posters and burn effigies? They want him to apologize...sheesh</p> <p>and i thought the work is already underway and the height is being raised??..maybe not</p> There was a problem with multiplex owners and Yashraj distributors but it was solved

Aamir is for the displaced people to get rehabilitated and so is the SC, so i dont know where the problem is.

Was Aamir Khan right in his views? And did he do the right thing by coming out in the open or was he doing this for publicity? One can go on debating. What is important to note is that Aamir Khan never really opposed the raising of the level of the dam. He just spoke for the proper rehabilitation of the people affected in the process. This is also the concern, not just of the NBAÂ’s prime mover Medha Patkar, but also of the Supreme Court. Then why does the youth wing of the BJP have a problem with Aamir Khan? Could it be that the party has run out of issues to protest on and had been out of the news for too long?

Just because he voiced his opinions, the politicians should tear his movie posters and burn effigies? They want him to apologize…sheesh

and i thought the work is already underway and the height is being raised??..maybe not

]]>
By: Eddie http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66165 Eddie Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:49:20 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66165 <p>Indian secularism is the Gandhian "sarva dharma sambhava" - all religions are considered noble and equal, which leads the state to protect and to -the height of silliness!- promote all religions. Other types of secularism are religion-indifferent secularism (United States), and anti-religion secularism (maybe France). I think the American model is best.</p> Indian secularism is the Gandhian “sarva dharma sambhava” – all religions are considered noble and equal, which leads the state to protect and to -the height of silliness!- promote all religions. Other types of secularism are religion-indifferent secularism (United States), and anti-religion secularism (maybe France). I think the American model is best.

]]>
By: SpoorLam http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66160 SpoorLam Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:36:32 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66160 <blockquote>In fact, Modi met the producers and promised them protection.</blockquote> <p>Hail Mogambo!</p> <p>Is there no end to our leaders greatness?</p> <p>Truly, he is the most humble, caring, and kind. The very face of India.</p> <p>Hail <a href="http://www.worldpress.org/images/0203guj.jpg">Modi-go</a>!</p> In fact, Modi met the producers and promised them protection.

Hail Mogambo!

Is there no end to our leaders greatness?

Truly, he is the most humble, caring, and kind. The very face of India.

Hail Modi-go!

]]>
By: MoorNam http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66155 MoorNam Mon, 05 Jun 2006 17:16:37 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66155 <p>Jeet,</p> <p>Regarding Fanaa... I am against banning anything, however, let's set the record straight.</p> <p>Aamir initally said that "<i>All the work on the dam should stop until the displaced villagers are settled</i>." We all know what this means: It's a way of un-democratically doing something which cannot be done by due process. That is, they tried to stop work on the dam - Supreme court said nothing doing. So now they want work stopped until a condition is met. When will the condition be met? Never. No matter how many villagers you compensate, they will keep bringing new claims in from all kinds of people claiming that they have been displaced. This will go on for years/decades, and all the while the work on the dam will be put on hold.</p> <p>Nice try. But it's been done before. Try something new.</p> <p>If the villagers are not compensated, then that is wrong and they should go to court. The very fact that they have not followed the due process of law (despite enormous sympathy they wield) goes to show that the really affected people have been compensated well (as the Gujarat govt claims), and these new claims are spurious.</p> <p>Secondly, even the Congress is up in arms against Aamir, and so are the Multiplex owners. In fact, <a href="http://in.rediff.com/movies/2006/may/26fanaa.htm">Modi met the producers and promised them protection</a>. But the theater owners refused to budge - apparently there's also an issue with the high rates multiplexes are demanding and Chopra does not wants them to lower rates.</p> <p>M. Nam</p> Jeet,

Regarding Fanaa… I am against banning anything, however, let’s set the record straight.

Aamir initally said that “All the work on the dam should stop until the displaced villagers are settled.” We all know what this means: It’s a way of un-democratically doing something which cannot be done by due process. That is, they tried to stop work on the dam – Supreme court said nothing doing. So now they want work stopped until a condition is met. When will the condition be met? Never. No matter how many villagers you compensate, they will keep bringing new claims in from all kinds of people claiming that they have been displaced. This will go on for years/decades, and all the while the work on the dam will be put on hold.

Nice try. But it’s been done before. Try something new.

If the villagers are not compensated, then that is wrong and they should go to court. The very fact that they have not followed the due process of law (despite enormous sympathy they wield) goes to show that the really affected people have been compensated well (as the Gujarat govt claims), and these new claims are spurious.

Secondly, even the Congress is up in arms against Aamir, and so are the Multiplex owners. In fact, Modi met the producers and promised them protection. But the theater owners refused to budge – apparently there’s also an issue with the high rates multiplexes are demanding and Chopra does not wants them to lower rates.

M. Nam

]]>
By: Jeet http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66140 Jeet Mon, 05 Jun 2006 15:49:57 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66140 <p>Fanaa was also banned in Gujarat because the leading actor of the movie, Aamir Khan, said something that "hurt the feeling of Gujaratis" according to youth group of BJP. He said that he wanted rehabilitation for the farmers and villagers who were displaced because the height of the dam is raised and that means some villages will be under water. BJP took it as Aamir is against the construction of the dam. He repeated his views in numerous <a href="http://sify.com/news/fullstory.php?id=14214245">press conferences</a> , but the gundas at BJP failed to grasp a single word and they still continue their <a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&sa=N&resnum=0&q=gujarat%20aamir&spell=1&tab=wn">protests</a>.</p> <p>God help these mavalees</p> Fanaa was also banned in Gujarat because the leading actor of the movie, Aamir Khan, said something that “hurt the feeling of Gujaratis” according to youth group of BJP. He said that he wanted rehabilitation for the farmers and villagers who were displaced because the height of the dam is raised and that means some villages will be under water. BJP took it as Aamir is against the construction of the dam. He repeated his views in numerous press conferences , but the gundas at BJP failed to grasp a single word and they still continue their protests.

God help these mavalees

]]>
By: salsette http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/06/03/oh_dear_andhra/comment-page-1/#comment-66042 salsette Mon, 05 Jun 2006 00:39:18 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3438#comment-66042 <blockquote>Opus Dei has a branch in India...one in Bombay and one in Delhi, I think.</blockquote> <p>heh... well, so do the freemasons, bang across sterling cinema, and the theosophists are near churchgate, and ummm the rajneeshis are in pune, and if you look around you'll find the ananda margis hiding somewhere...</p> <p>you almost sound like you want to go on a cult/secret society hunt...;)</p> <p>Jokes apart. It is silly to engage people who argue on the lines of "ooooh but you wouldnt react like this if it was your god who was being blasphemeed!!"</p> <p>Like the the last poster... im fairly agnostic, but to the believers my question is : If you say god is all powerfull, why would he need nitwits like you to safeguard the divine image of his avatars, his prophets or even his 'children'?"</p> Opus Dei has a branch in India…one in Bombay and one in Delhi, I think.

heh… well, so do the freemasons, bang across sterling cinema, and the theosophists are near churchgate, and ummm the rajneeshis are in pune, and if you look around you’ll find the ananda margis hiding somewhere…

you almost sound like you want to go on a cult/secret society hunt…;)

Jokes apart. It is silly to engage people who argue on the lines of “ooooh but you wouldnt react like this if it was your god who was being blasphemeed!!”

Like the the last poster… im fairly agnostic, but to the believers my question is : If you say god is all powerfull, why would he need nitwits like you to safeguard the divine image of his avatars, his prophets or even his ‘children’?”

]]>