Comments on: “U.K.’s Highest Court Backs School Ban on Muslim Dress” http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Wholesale hats http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-277815 Wholesale hats Mon, 23 Aug 2010 03:48:29 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-277815 <p>Good blog. thanks for sharing!!!!!!welcom to http://www.i-capshop.com</p> <p><a href="http://www.i-capshop.com"target="_blank">Wholesale New Era Caps</a></p> Good blog. thanks for sharing!!!!!!welcom to http://www.i-capshop.com

Wholesale New Era Caps

]]>
By: Robin http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-198112 Robin Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:00:04 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-198112 <p>The school and the courts and the government were way out of line in this ruling. There was NO safety hazard in her clothing and the 'uniform' allowed by the school were not muslim uniforms but cultural ones. Not allowing her to wear the Islamic hijab is akin to forcing religious catholics to come to school topless and in a miniskirt - that's how serious the islamic jelbab is for orthodox Muslims. The argument that she could have gone to another school nearby is an assertion that schools have a right to oppress and that if students don't like it they can go elsewhere. Clearly Islamaphobia has infected the general masses, the judicial system and the government. I do have some hope in Brown - but he uis but a single individual. Its high time Muslims began breaking off financial and educational dependance from a system that hates them and oppresses them. its high time Muslims began a process of financial independance on a global scale.</p> The school and the courts and the government were way out of line in this ruling. There was NO safety hazard in her clothing and the ‘uniform’ allowed by the school were not muslim uniforms but cultural ones. Not allowing her to wear the Islamic hijab is akin to forcing religious catholics to come to school topless and in a miniskirt – that’s how serious the islamic jelbab is for orthodox Muslims. The argument that she could have gone to another school nearby is an assertion that schools have a right to oppress and that if students don’t like it they can go elsewhere. Clearly Islamaphobia has infected the general masses, the judicial system and the government. I do have some hope in Brown – but he uis but a single individual. Its high time Muslims began breaking off financial and educational dependance from a system that hates them and oppresses them. its high time Muslims began a process of financial independance on a global scale.

]]>
By: Baby doll <3 http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-89865 Baby doll <3 Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:54:13 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-89865 <p>If your planning to go to a school in the UK with its own rules and regulations ect. that means wearing the uniform if they have one. You cant go in and say i believe in this that and the other so you have to treat me different to everyone else. The whole point of the uniform is to make pupils look smart and respectful and on top of all equal. Most public schools are not religeous, The local school i went to never even mentioned a god or a prayer. How are these girls wishing to wear the 'jilbab' supposed to take part in a games lesson? Thats where i agree there would be a safety issue. I dont understand why the issue was so big basicly if they want to wear it they should go to a school that supports that.</p> If your planning to go to a school in the UK with its own rules and regulations ect. that means wearing the uniform if they have one. You cant go in and say i believe in this that and the other so you have to treat me different to everyone else. The whole point of the uniform is to make pupils look smart and respectful and on top of all equal. Most public schools are not religeous, The local school i went to never even mentioned a god or a prayer. How are these girls wishing to wear the ‘jilbab’ supposed to take part in a games lesson? Thats where i agree there would be a safety issue. I dont understand why the issue was so big basicly if they want to wear it they should go to a school that supports that.

]]>
By: dudette http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-51794 dudette Sat, 25 Mar 2006 07:39:18 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51794 <p>zee, do u feel better now? did that rant make u a better person? i dont think so. i think we will have to hear ur sort over and over again. at every gathering there is always that very impassioned person convinced of what they are saying, even though they are wrong, or disconnected.</p> <p>good luck walking to school when the oil runs out. oh yeah, and ofcourse, no plastics, unless they find a whole lot more in russia and the north sea and the gulf.</p> <p>wow, i didnt know people went on like that in this day and age.</p> <p>and then to have the courage in an anonymous blog to go on the offensive with the vast majority of muslims, they who have better things to do then go after a bunch of extremist crackpot neither representing them or their cultures.</p> <p>good show.</p> <p>and i say this with all sincerity, being neither an arab, or a muslim.</p> zee, do u feel better now? did that rant make u a better person? i dont think so. i think we will have to hear ur sort over and over again. at every gathering there is always that very impassioned person convinced of what they are saying, even though they are wrong, or disconnected.

good luck walking to school when the oil runs out. oh yeah, and ofcourse, no plastics, unless they find a whole lot more in russia and the north sea and the gulf.

wow, i didnt know people went on like that in this day and age.

and then to have the courage in an anonymous blog to go on the offensive with the vast majority of muslims, they who have better things to do then go after a bunch of extremist crackpot neither representing them or their cultures.

good show.

and i say this with all sincerity, being neither an arab, or a muslim.

]]>
By: bytewords http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-51734 bytewords Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:12:06 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51734 <p>I didn't know of this site during the French headscarves ban, but did the exact conversation play out then too? These have no resolution. No matter what you say, someone is going to hate you for it.</p> <p>Besides uniforms to me bring back memories of school and the very very pretty girl who sat next to me in high school for 3 years... who wants to spoil that memory? :)</p> I didn’t know of this site during the French headscarves ban, but did the exact conversation play out then too? These have no resolution. No matter what you say, someone is going to hate you for it.

Besides uniforms to me bring back memories of school and the very very pretty girl who sat next to me in high school for 3 years… who wants to spoil that memory? :)

]]>
By: Zee http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-51717 Zee Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:29:25 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51717 <p>Nowhere does it say in the Quran that muslim women have to cover themselves up from head to toe.</p> <p>The Extremists have hijacked Islam, the moderates are very shallow and spineless to correct the extremists.</p> <p>Muslims will have a neagtive image as long as the moderates hide and sadly this will continue on financed by $audi Oil.</p> <p>I hope the Oil runs out soon, then the Arabs can be nomads once again, because thats what they are good for.</p> Nowhere does it say in the Quran that muslim women have to cover themselves up from head to toe.

The Extremists have hijacked Islam, the moderates are very shallow and spineless to correct the extremists.

Muslims will have a neagtive image as long as the moderates hide and sadly this will continue on financed by $audi Oil.

I hope the Oil runs out soon, then the Arabs can be nomads once again, because thats what they are good for.

]]>
By: Kenyandesi http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-2/#comment-51690 Kenyandesi Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:07:56 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51690 <blockquote>With regards to the Golden Temple, I'd be grateful if evidence could be provided that it is indeed owned by "the state". I was under the impression that the Golden Temple falls under the jurisdiction of the Akal Takht and the SGPC.</blockquote> <p>I defer to you on this one, I was under a different impression having had a similar discussion about dress codes/conduct of foreigners in religious areas with some friends in India.</p> <blockquote>Yes but this dress code is defined by Sikh religious traditions based on precedents stretching back at least 300 years, along with the established consensus on this issue by the Akal Takht and the SGPC. Dress codes within gurdwaras are not defined by the Indian government.</blockquote> <p>yeah but these uniforms were designed in conjunction with the community at hand. Not the government.</p> With regards to the Golden Temple, I’d be grateful if evidence could be provided that it is indeed owned by “the state”. I was under the impression that the Golden Temple falls under the jurisdiction of the Akal Takht and the SGPC.

I defer to you on this one, I was under a different impression having had a similar discussion about dress codes/conduct of foreigners in religious areas with some friends in India.

Yes but this dress code is defined by Sikh religious traditions based on precedents stretching back at least 300 years, along with the established consensus on this issue by the Akal Takht and the SGPC. Dress codes within gurdwaras are not defined by the Indian government.

yeah but these uniforms were designed in conjunction with the community at hand. Not the government.

]]>
By: Jai http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-1/#comment-51689 Jai Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:01:30 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51689 <blockquote>Neither the Kaaba nor the Golden temple are privately owned. They are state owned. </blockquote> <p>With regards to the Golden Temple, I'd be grateful if evidence could be provided that it is indeed owned by "the state". I was under the impression that the Golden Temple falls under the jurisdiction of the Akal Takht and the SGPC.</p> <blockquote>Dress codes apply. </blockquote> <p>Yes but this dress code is defined by Sikh religious traditions based on precedents stretching back at least 300 years, along with the established consensus on this issue by the Akal Takht and the SGPC. Dress codes within gurdwaras are not defined by the Indian government.</p> Neither the Kaaba nor the Golden temple are privately owned. They are state owned.

With regards to the Golden Temple, I’d be grateful if evidence could be provided that it is indeed owned by “the state”. I was under the impression that the Golden Temple falls under the jurisdiction of the Akal Takht and the SGPC.

Dress codes apply.

Yes but this dress code is defined by Sikh religious traditions based on precedents stretching back at least 300 years, along with the established consensus on this issue by the Akal Takht and the SGPC. Dress codes within gurdwaras are not defined by the Indian government.

]]>
By: dost http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-1/#comment-51683 dost Fri, 24 Mar 2006 16:10:00 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51683 <blockquote>Dost, given that you have a fundamental issue with the idea of the UNIFORM itself, you're going to want to allow people to wear what they like within certain parameters. I on the other hand firmly believe in having a uniform, so i beleive as long as no on is being asked to be immodest, if you go to a school that does not allow a certain type of dress and you have alternative (in this care TWO other schools that allowed the jibab), then why not move? Was this really a case of discrimination, or was it just a political statement made for the sake of making it? If this man really cared about his sisters education he would have found alternatives for her.</blockquote> <p>I agree that we have differing viewpoints on whether or not public schools should require uniforms, and as I indicated before, I respect your viewpoint. However, at least in an American constitutional context (i realize that this is a UK issue, but speaking broadly), my point is that there is a constitutional rights issue here. They have to decide whether or not one should be allowed to wear this type of clothing to a public school if one believes that it is a part of their religious expression. IF the answer to this is yes, they should be allowed, then it does not matter that other schools allow it; if this school doesn't, they are infringing upon the constitutional rights of the girl. However, if it is decided that public schools do not have a duty to allow this level of religious expression, then fine, this school is within its rights. All i'm saying is that this debate should be framed as one of constitutional rights, and not, what you think Islam requires. Different people have different perspectives on how to practice their faith, and it is not up to you or I to tell someone what to do in terms of religion.</p> <blockquote>Also NOWHERE in the Koran does it REQUIRE women to wear a jibab. </blockquote> <p>I think it is intellectually dishonest to make general statements such as this. There is disagreement amongst muslim jurists as to what appropriate/required dress is, and there are, IMO, reasonable opinions on both sides of this argument. But to say that it is not required and says so in the Quran is not accurate. There are entire books devoted to these issues, and I am neither knowledgable enough, nor have enough space here to go into that.</p> <blockquote>Neither the Kaaba nor the Golden temple are privately owned. They are state owned. Dress codes apply. Those are two very quick examples. </blockquote> <p>You'll note that I said, 'for the most part'. You've pointed out two examples...great. If you can prove to me that more than, say, 20% of mosques are state owned, then I would agree. In any case, I'm not sure I understood the relevance of that argument anyways, but I'd say MOST mosques are private, and thus are not the same as a public school with regard to dress code.</p> Dost, given that you have a fundamental issue with the idea of the UNIFORM itself, you’re going to want to allow people to wear what they like within certain parameters. I on the other hand firmly believe in having a uniform, so i beleive as long as no on is being asked to be immodest, if you go to a school that does not allow a certain type of dress and you have alternative (in this care TWO other schools that allowed the jibab), then why not move? Was this really a case of discrimination, or was it just a political statement made for the sake of making it? If this man really cared about his sisters education he would have found alternatives for her.

I agree that we have differing viewpoints on whether or not public schools should require uniforms, and as I indicated before, I respect your viewpoint. However, at least in an American constitutional context (i realize that this is a UK issue, but speaking broadly), my point is that there is a constitutional rights issue here. They have to decide whether or not one should be allowed to wear this type of clothing to a public school if one believes that it is a part of their religious expression. IF the answer to this is yes, they should be allowed, then it does not matter that other schools allow it; if this school doesn’t, they are infringing upon the constitutional rights of the girl. However, if it is decided that public schools do not have a duty to allow this level of religious expression, then fine, this school is within its rights. All i’m saying is that this debate should be framed as one of constitutional rights, and not, what you think Islam requires. Different people have different perspectives on how to practice their faith, and it is not up to you or I to tell someone what to do in terms of religion.

Also NOWHERE in the Koran does it REQUIRE women to wear a jibab.

I think it is intellectually dishonest to make general statements such as this. There is disagreement amongst muslim jurists as to what appropriate/required dress is, and there are, IMO, reasonable opinions on both sides of this argument. But to say that it is not required and says so in the Quran is not accurate. There are entire books devoted to these issues, and I am neither knowledgable enough, nor have enough space here to go into that.

Neither the Kaaba nor the Golden temple are privately owned. They are state owned. Dress codes apply. Those are two very quick examples.

You’ll note that I said, ‘for the most part’. You’ve pointed out two examples…great. If you can prove to me that more than, say, 20% of mosques are state owned, then I would agree. In any case, I’m not sure I understood the relevance of that argument anyways, but I’d say MOST mosques are private, and thus are not the same as a public school with regard to dress code.

]]>
By: Vikram http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/23/in_2000_shabina/comment-page-1/#comment-51678 Vikram Fri, 24 Mar 2006 15:20:20 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3190#comment-51678 <blockquote> there are neo-nazi groups in germany attacking/killing/harassing turkish and other immigrants, should we then assume all germans are like this? there are some american sex-tourists going to india and thailand and other s.e. asian countries to molest and abuse little children, so i guess all american men must be the same. </blockquote> <p>Interesting that you should choose to defend Islamic fanatics by using the analogies of a murderous political doctrine and pedophiles.</p> there are neo-nazi groups in germany attacking/killing/harassing turkish and other immigrants, should we then assume all germans are like this? there are some american sex-tourists going to india and thailand and other s.e. asian countries to molest and abuse little children, so i guess all american men must be the same.

Interesting that you should choose to defend Islamic fanatics by using the analogies of a murderous political doctrine and pedophiles.

]]>