Comments on: Wicked Googly, Mr. President http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: KingmanIII http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-210943 KingmanIII Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:07:43 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-210943 <p><i>19 · <b><a href="mailto:maduraivivekan@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">Madurai Vivekan</a></b> <a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/003086.html#comment49384">said</a></i></p> <blockquote> Then let's not forget the length of matches. One-day matches take about seven hours. Test matches take five days. The longest <b style="color: black; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 102);">baseball</b> game was what - 17 innings? 19 innings? Puh-leeeeease!</blockquote> <p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_professional_baseball_game</p> 19 · Madurai Vivekan said

Then let’s not forget the length of matches. One-day matches take about seven hours. Test matches take five days. The longest baseball game was what – 17 innings? 19 innings? Puh-leeeeease!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_professional_baseball_game

]]>
By: Madurai Vivekan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49384 Madurai Vivekan Wed, 08 Mar 2006 06:33:37 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49384 <p>ooo, this is fun!</p> <blockquote>Despite the similarities these are just two very different games.</blockquote> <p>I think they are similar enough that they're quite comparable: they both involve batting, fielding, and running. There are several ways the batter can get out in each sport, and several of these overlap.</p> <blockquote>One can say that the batters in baseball wear less protection than the batsmen in cricket.</blockquote> <p>This is true; however, getting hit by the ball isn't as much a part of baseball as it is of cricket, so padding is necessary to prevent injury. In baseball, the pitcher is punished for hitting a batter (hit-by-pitch); in cricket, the bowler is often rewarded for hitting a batter (leg before wicket). That's pretty hardcore.</p> <p>In baseball, the people who do actually get hit with the ball on a regular basis (the catcher and the ump) do wear lots of padding. And it's not like baseball batters don't wear any padding at all - they do wear protection while batting; unlike cricket, however, baseball players can remove their padding once they reach base safely. Cricketers have to keep running back and forth with all that padding. Oh, and then there's the bat. Baseball players can just chuck it aside when they don't need it anymore, whereas cricketers keep running with it.</p> <p>Then there's the field: baseball is played within the confines of a right angle. Cricket is played in a circle, so even if the ball goes behind the batter it's still in play. Granted, there are two more fielders in cricket, but there are still 270 more degrees to cover.</p> <p>In baseball, you get at least three plate appearances during a game to try and make your mark on offense. In cricket you get one chance.</p> <p>Then let's not forget the length of matches. One-day matches take about seven hours. Test matches take five days. The longest baseball game was what - 17 innings? 19 innings? Puh-leeeeease!</p> <p>Yup, cricket's SO much more hardcore.</p> ooo, this is fun!

Despite the similarities these are just two very different games.

I think they are similar enough that they’re quite comparable: they both involve batting, fielding, and running. There are several ways the batter can get out in each sport, and several of these overlap.

One can say that the batters in baseball wear less protection than the batsmen in cricket.

This is true; however, getting hit by the ball isn’t as much a part of baseball as it is of cricket, so padding is necessary to prevent injury. In baseball, the pitcher is punished for hitting a batter (hit-by-pitch); in cricket, the bowler is often rewarded for hitting a batter (leg before wicket). That’s pretty hardcore.

In baseball, the people who do actually get hit with the ball on a regular basis (the catcher and the ump) do wear lots of padding. And it’s not like baseball batters don’t wear any padding at all – they do wear protection while batting; unlike cricket, however, baseball players can remove their padding once they reach base safely. Cricketers have to keep running back and forth with all that padding. Oh, and then there’s the bat. Baseball players can just chuck it aside when they don’t need it anymore, whereas cricketers keep running with it.

Then there’s the field: baseball is played within the confines of a right angle. Cricket is played in a circle, so even if the ball goes behind the batter it’s still in play. Granted, there are two more fielders in cricket, but there are still 270 more degrees to cover.

In baseball, you get at least three plate appearances during a game to try and make your mark on offense. In cricket you get one chance.

Then let’s not forget the length of matches. One-day matches take about seven hours. Test matches take five days. The longest baseball game was what – 17 innings? 19 innings? Puh-leeeeease!

Yup, cricket’s SO much more hardcore.

]]>
By: DHiraj http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49343 DHiraj Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:50:37 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49343 <p>The headlines on the BBC news needs to be corrected. Cricket is not the national spor of Pakistan</p> <p>Check <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sports_In_Pakistan">here</a></p> The headlines on the BBC news needs to be corrected. Cricket is not the national spor of Pakistan

Check here

]]>
By: Tanveer http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49259 Tanveer Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:22:12 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49259 <p>cricfan: LOL Madurai: Dunno whether u can call cricket more hardcore just because the fielders dont wear gloves. One can say that the batters in baseball wear less protection than the batsmen in cricket. Despite the similarities these are just two very different games. One is not necessarily more hardcore than the other.</p> cricfan: LOL Madurai: Dunno whether u can call cricket more hardcore just because the fielders dont wear gloves. One can say that the batters in baseball wear less protection than the batsmen in cricket. Despite the similarities these are just two very different games. One is not necessarily more hardcore than the other.

]]>
By: Yohannan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49086 Yohannan Mon, 06 Mar 2006 15:10:40 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49086 <p>Have we finally found something that our President may be mediocre at? He is a hero of 'just functioning.'</p> Have we finally found something that our President may be mediocre at? He is a hero of ‘just functioning.’

]]>
By: Madurai Vivekan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49056 Madurai Vivekan Mon, 06 Mar 2006 05:00:40 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49056 <p><a href="http://www.sepiamutiny.com/sepia/archives/003086.html#comment48991">dhaavak</a>:</p> <blockquote>...he seems to be weighing it on the end of his fingers to get a sense of how much more dense it is than a baseball...</blockquote> <p><a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/NASApp/mlb/mlb/official_info/official_rules/objectives_1.jsp">Baseball</a>:</p> <blockquote>[The ball] shall weigh not less than five nor more than 5 1/4 ounces avoirdupois and measure not less than nine nor more than 9 1/4 inches in circumference.</blockquote> <p><a href="http://www.lords.org/laws-and-spirit/laws-of-cricket/laws/law-5-the-ball,31,AR.html">Cricket</a>:</p> <blockquote>The ball, when new, shall weigh not less than 5 1/2 ounces/155.9g, nor more than 5 3/4 ounces/163g, and shall measure not less than 8 13/16 in/22.4cm, nor more than 9 in/22.9cm in circumference.</blockquote> <p>The two balls are approximately the same size. MLB plays with 5 1/4 oz. balls and most cricket balls tend to be 5 1/2 oz. Not sure about the avg. circumference of each. Yes, cricket balls are denser, but only slightly, and unlike baseball, they get softer as the game goes on because they're not changed all the time like they are in baseball.</p> <p>What makes cricket more hardcore than baseball isn't the size of the ball, but how it's used - no gloves.</p> dhaavak:

…he seems to be weighing it on the end of his fingers to get a sense of how much more dense it is than a baseball…

Baseball:

[The ball] shall weigh not less than five nor more than 5 1/4 ounces avoirdupois and measure not less than nine nor more than 9 1/4 inches in circumference.

Cricket:

The ball, when new, shall weigh not less than 5 1/2 ounces/155.9g, nor more than 5 3/4 ounces/163g, and shall measure not less than 8 13/16 in/22.4cm, nor more than 9 in/22.9cm in circumference.

The two balls are approximately the same size. MLB plays with 5 1/4 oz. balls and most cricket balls tend to be 5 1/2 oz. Not sure about the avg. circumference of each. Yes, cricket balls are denser, but only slightly, and unlike baseball, they get softer as the game goes on because they’re not changed all the time like they are in baseball.

What makes cricket more hardcore than baseball isn’t the size of the ball, but how it’s used – no gloves.

]]>
By: Ennis http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49017 Ennis Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:52:23 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49017 <p>Dhaavak - fixed the link - I meant to refer to <a href="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41403000/jpg/_41403584_bushball_ap416.jpg">this photo</a>.</p> Dhaavak – fixed the link – I meant to refer to this photo.

]]>
By: Pattie Kaur http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49013 Pattie Kaur Sun, 05 Mar 2006 19:41:47 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49013 <p><b>And dubya looks like a monkey in these pics.</b></p> <p>he always does. his nose also looks like the tail end of a roast chicken. anynohho, it IS nice to se him having fun instead of his usual antics...though he seem to enoy that a lot too.</p> And dubya looks like a monkey in these pics.

he always does. his nose also looks like the tail end of a roast chicken. anynohho, it IS nice to se him having fun instead of his usual antics…though he seem to enoy that a lot too.

]]>
By: cricfan http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49009 cricfan Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:56:55 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49009 <p>Poor Inzamam caught between BUTT and BUSH !</p> Poor Inzamam caught between BUTT and BUSH !

]]>
By: dhaavak http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2006/03/04/wicked_googly_m/comment-page-1/#comment-49007 dhaavak Sun, 05 Mar 2006 18:45:09 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=3086#comment-49007 <p>ennis - sorry about my earlier post - i had a brain fart - ... what I meant to say... Ennis - maybe you are looking at the wrong image - because the <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/4775096.stm">link </a>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/4775096.stm ... at least to me shows a red ball - right under the yellow star on the clean shaven guy's green blazer -</p> ennis – sorry about my earlier post – i had a brain fart – … what I meant to say… Ennis – maybe you are looking at the wrong image – because the link http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_pictures/4775096.stm … at least to me shows a red ball – right under the yellow star on the clean shaven guy’s green blazer -

]]>