Comments on: Pipe dream http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: SilkyLady http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-2/#comment-39719 SilkyLady Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:39:48 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-39719 <p>How did the chat about <b>Serendipity </b>turn into the "<b>SATC</b>" chat??? I liked the movie but I was seriously looking for the name of the song that <i><b>Corbin's</b></i> character was playing in the movie.. I loved it and wanted to try and either download it or buy it... Do you know the name of the <u>Shehenai song </u>that was in the "<u><i><b>Viking</b></i></u>" video??? - <b>LOL </b>!!!!</p> How did the chat about Serendipity turn into the “SATC” chat??? I liked the movie but I was seriously looking for the name of the song that Corbin’s character was playing in the movie.. I loved it and wanted to try and either download it or buy it… Do you know the name of the Shehenai song that was in the “Viking” video??? – LOL !!!!

]]>
By: Fuerza Dulce http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-2/#comment-35603 Fuerza Dulce Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:32:57 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35603 <blockquote>Let me guess, you love watching "The Apprentice" too. Only thing worst than alpha-males and the women who love them are the wannabes.</blockquote> <p>Actually, I can't stand The Apprentice. My opinion of Big being hot doesn't automatically turn me into an alpha male groupie, nor does it make the fantasy created for the target SATC demographic into my own personal fantasy. Did you miss the part where I said I wouldn't put up with the same sh*t Big gave Carrie?</p> Let me guess, you love watching “The Apprentice” too. Only thing worst than alpha-males and the women who love them are the wannabes.

Actually, I can’t stand The Apprentice. My opinion of Big being hot doesn’t automatically turn me into an alpha male groupie, nor does it make the fantasy created for the target SATC demographic into my own personal fantasy. Did you miss the part where I said I wouldn’t put up with the same sh*t Big gave Carrie?

]]>
By: Jai Singh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-2/#comment-35591 Jai Singh Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:27:10 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35591 <p>*Hence <b>by </b>earlier points</p> <p>Typo, should say "<b>My </b>earlier points etc"</p> *Hence by earlier points

Typo, should say “My earlier points etc”

]]>
By: Jai Singh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-2/#comment-35590 Jai Singh Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:26:01 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35590 <p>Carrie Patel,</p> <p>My point was that, either by accident or by design (and the fact that they kept blabbing personal relationship information to each other during their lunch get-togethers didn't help either), they did not end up being emotionally closer to their partners than to their friends. Yes, close female friendships have their own unique dynamic (as do close male-male friendships), but ideally one's partner should be one's best friend too -- that's how close you two should be to each other and how well you should get on -- and that was what was basically going wrong in the 4some's lives.</p> <p>Hence by earlier points about a) they were going for the wrong men for the wrong reasons, and b) they were behaving incorrectly and inappropriately with regards to divulging extremely personal information about the guy and/or the relationship to third parties, namely each other.</p> Carrie Patel,

My point was that, either by accident or by design (and the fact that they kept blabbing personal relationship information to each other during their lunch get-togethers didn’t help either), they did not end up being emotionally closer to their partners than to their friends. Yes, close female friendships have their own unique dynamic (as do close male-male friendships), but ideally one’s partner should be one’s best friend too — that’s how close you two should be to each other and how well you should get on — and that was what was basically going wrong in the 4some’s lives.

Hence by earlier points about a) they were going for the wrong men for the wrong reasons, and b) they were behaving incorrectly and inappropriately with regards to divulging extremely personal information about the guy and/or the relationship to third parties, namely each other.

]]>
By: Carrie Bradshaw Patel http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-2/#comment-35511 Carrie Bradshaw Patel Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:13:13 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35511 <blockquote>They were closer to each other emotionally than they were to the guys they went out with, even if the relationships with the various men became semi-long-term. In some ways this wasn't surprising as they would sometimes get involved with guys for completely the wrong reasons, but none of that was a good basis to build a "proper" long-term relationship upon.</blockquote> <p>Why is it unhealthy to maintain close friendships while in a long term romantic relationship? Why is it unusual for somebody to remain close to friends that they've had for over 10 years longer than they've had the relationship?</p> <p>I don't understand why men and women are supposed to abandon their friendships to make their relationships work, or even to downgrade them. These are different spheres of life, and while you should always be friends with your partner, that doesn't mean that your partner should eclipse all other friends.</p> They were closer to each other emotionally than they were to the guys they went out with, even if the relationships with the various men became semi-long-term. In some ways this wasn’t surprising as they would sometimes get involved with guys for completely the wrong reasons, but none of that was a good basis to build a “proper” long-term relationship upon.

Why is it unhealthy to maintain close friendships while in a long term romantic relationship? Why is it unusual for somebody to remain close to friends that they’ve had for over 10 years longer than they’ve had the relationship?

I don’t understand why men and women are supposed to abandon their friendships to make their relationships work, or even to downgrade them. These are different spheres of life, and while you should always be friends with your partner, that doesn’t mean that your partner should eclipse all other friends.

]]>
By: Neha http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-2/#comment-35510 Neha Tue, 22 Nov 2005 18:09:10 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35510 <p>Here's another thing the SATC gallies were doing wrong with capital W: Never talking about condoms and barely mentioning birth control. Issues any sexually active female should be talking about with her best friends, in the real world that is.</p> Here’s another thing the SATC gallies were doing wrong with capital W: Never talking about condoms and barely mentioning birth control. Issues any sexually active female should be talking about with her best friends, in the real world that is.

]]>
By: sank http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-1/#comment-35506 sank Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:49:40 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35506 <p>gujjubhai gets a gold star.... the persian route is actually a corruption of the sanskrit sinhaladvipa, meaning “island where lions dwell” ...from that sinhala/sinhalese, the main sri lankan tounge</p> gujjubhai gets a gold star…. the persian route is actually a corruption of the sanskrit sinhaladvipa, meaning “island where lions dwell” …from that sinhala/sinhalese, the main sri lankan tounge

]]>
By: Jai Singh http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-1/#comment-35502 Jai Singh Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:21:49 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35502 <p>As a guy, and therefore from a male point of view, let me fill you ladies in one what the SATC foursome were "doing wrong", at least from my own perspective:</p> <ul> <li>They were very immature for their age(s).</li> <li>They were quite petty in the reasons why they were breaking up with some of the guys they were involved with.</li> <li>They would tell each other far too much about the intricacies and "personal details" of their relationships with the various men -- it negated the actual & potential emotional intimacy with the guys.</li> <li>They were closer to each other emotionally than they were to the guys they went out with, even if the relationships with the various men became semi-long-term. In some ways this wasn't surprising as they would sometimes get involved with guys for completely the wrong reasons, but none of that was a good basis to build a "proper" long-term relationship upon.</li> </ul> <p>However, I did think that the depiction of the various arguments and fallings-out Carrie had with Big was the best part of the show -- very realistic sometimes and often completely spot-on (especially the final, screaming argument they had on the street when Carrie is shouting at him "You and me -- <i>nothing !! </i>").</p> As a guy, and therefore from a male point of view, let me fill you ladies in one what the SATC foursome were “doing wrong”, at least from my own perspective:

  • They were very immature for their age(s).
  • They were quite petty in the reasons why they were breaking up with some of the guys they were involved with.
  • They would tell each other far too much about the intricacies and “personal details” of their relationships with the various men — it negated the actual & potential emotional intimacy with the guys.
  • They were closer to each other emotionally than they were to the guys they went out with, even if the relationships with the various men became semi-long-term. In some ways this wasn’t surprising as they would sometimes get involved with guys for completely the wrong reasons, but none of that was a good basis to build a “proper” long-term relationship upon.

However, I did think that the depiction of the various arguments and fallings-out Carrie had with Big was the best part of the show — very realistic sometimes and often completely spot-on (especially the final, screaming argument they had on the street when Carrie is shouting at him “You and me — nothing !! “).

]]>
By: Rupa http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-1/#comment-35393 Rupa Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:08:11 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35393 <p>Right back atcha, SupaRupa!</p> Right back atcha, SupaRupa!

]]>
By: Pattie Kaur http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2005/11/20/pipe_dream/comment-page-1/#comment-35388 Pattie Kaur Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:29:12 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=2550#comment-35388 <p><b>that's it. i'm officially the only person who never got into Sex and the City.</p> <p>i'm some sort of freak for my generation arent i?</b></p> <p>no. because there's two of us! i was watching re-runs of 60's and 70's shows trying avoid that kinda stuff. ;)</p> that’s it. i’m officially the only person who never got into Sex and the City.

i’m some sort of freak for my generation arent i?

no. because there’s two of us! i was watching re-runs of 60′s and 70′s shows trying avoid that kinda stuff. ;)

]]>