Comments on: Kal Penn defends ‘Harold and Kumar’ http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/ All that flavorful brownness in one savory packet Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Borealis956 http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-243381 Borealis956 Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:38:57 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-243381 <blockquote>And anyone even hinting at a homophobic joke will be cut both figuratively and physically</blockquote> <p>by Jagjit.</p> <p>I love that people might/will be "cut" physically. That's the best remedy for everything, didn't you know? If it isn't right, violence will solve the problem! Yay violence!</p> And anyone even hinting at a homophobic joke will be cut both figuratively and physically

by Jagjit.

I love that people might/will be “cut” physically. That’s the best remedy for everything, didn’t you know? If it isn’t right, violence will solve the problem! Yay violence!

]]>
By: Vince http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-230090 Vince Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:44:35 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-230090 <blockquote> <p>[T]he bit about slapping a bag of weed is intended to make fun of Kumar</p> </blockquote> <p>It's not intended to make fun of Kumar ... you're perceiving something onto it which wasn't intended ...</p> <p>You yourself said you missed the Raging Bull reference ... rewire your perceptions and view the scene again ...</p>

[T]he bit about slapping a bag of weed is intended to make fun of Kumar

It’s not intended to make fun of Kumar … you’re perceiving something onto it which wasn’t intended …

You yourself said you missed the Raging Bull reference … rewire your perceptions and view the scene again …

]]>
By: irritated reader http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-202321 irritated reader Sat, 03 May 2008 23:12:52 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-202321 <p>If you have a problem with the movie, or any movies that aren't "politically correct", then don't watch them! Ever heard of the saying "ignorance is bliss"? This world is trying so hard to become politically correct, but there is always going to be someone or some group left out. I think that the writers made those characters so as to mock the stereotypes society has created. Instead of feeling offended because of the movie, you should feel glad that the writers brought those stereotypes to attention.</p> <p>And in regards to your poster; I can't tell if it's a joke, or if you're serious about it. I want to laugh at it, but I'm afraid I will offend someone.</p> If you have a problem with the movie, or any movies that aren’t “politically correct”, then don’t watch them! Ever heard of the saying “ignorance is bliss”? This world is trying so hard to become politically correct, but there is always going to be someone or some group left out. I think that the writers made those characters so as to mock the stereotypes society has created. Instead of feeling offended because of the movie, you should feel glad that the writers brought those stereotypes to attention.

And in regards to your poster; I can’t tell if it’s a joke, or if you’re serious about it. I want to laugh at it, but I’m afraid I will offend someone.

]]>
By: sdafasdf http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-194409 sdafasdf Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:57:22 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-194409 <p>Democracy. People should be allowed to make whatever movies they want. Stupid feminist bitch.</p> Democracy. People should be allowed to make whatever movies they want. Stupid feminist bitch.

]]>
By: Adam http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-193989 Adam Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:21:28 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-193989 <p>Get a life?</p> Get a life?

]]>
By: Ian Adams http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-111542 Ian Adams Sat, 13 Jan 2007 00:01:00 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-111542 <p>Jagjit, seriously, calm down. It's just a movie. A very funny, very witty movie, but not one you're forced to watch. If you don't like it, or if you're too stupid to understand what's really happening in it, then don't watch it. You are not entitled to any right to force other people to shut up just because you don't like what they say.</p> Jagjit, seriously, calm down. It’s just a movie. A very funny, very witty movie, but not one you’re forced to watch. If you don’t like it, or if you’re too stupid to understand what’s really happening in it, then don’t watch it. You are not entitled to any right to force other people to shut up just because you don’t like what they say.

]]>
By: Sanjay http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-32289 Sanjay Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:31:14 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-32289 <p>Dude you guys seriously dont know him hez had the Narika links way way way back.I think you should research something before writing it down.Kal penn is really involved with the organizations way before he got famous.</p> Dude you guys seriously dont know him hez had the Narika links way way way back.I think you should research something before writing it down.Kal penn is really involved with the organizations way before he got famous.

]]>
By: Manish Vij http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-589 Manish Vij Thu, 09 Sep 2004 19:31:40 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-589 <blockquote>it says that 'Kal Penn now has a link to Narika'. I looked at his website a few months ago before "Harold and Kumar" and it was there...</blockquote> <p>That seems right, the <a href="http://www.waybackmachine.org">Wayback Machine</a> shows the Narika link was probably added in December '03.</p> it says that ‘Kal Penn now has a link to Narika’. I looked at his website a few months ago before “Harold and Kumar” and it was there…

That seems right, the Wayback Machine shows the Narika link was probably added in December ’03.

]]>
By: praful http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-588 praful Thu, 09 Sep 2004 19:10:07 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-588 <p>Um - it says that 'Kal Penn now has a link to Narika'. I looked at his website a few months ago before "Harold and Kumar" and it was there with a bunch of anti-profiling and human rights stuff. Sorry to say, but looks like the south asian sisters had very little to do with that. Just trying to give credit where it's due and stop all the whining and misdirected banter. Real action is where it's at. Where's Jagit's script? Post when it's ready, we're all rooting for it and wanna read it!</p> Um – it says that ‘Kal Penn now has a link to Narika’. I looked at his website a few months ago before “Harold and Kumar” and it was there with a bunch of anti-profiling and human rights stuff. Sorry to say, but looks like the south asian sisters had very little to do with that. Just trying to give credit where it’s due and stop all the whining and misdirected banter. Real action is where it’s at. Where’s Jagit’s script? Post when it’s ready, we’re all rooting for it and wanna read it!

]]>
By: A N N A http://sepiamutiny.com/blog/2004/08/31/kal_penn_defend/comment-page-1/#comment-587 A N N A Mon, 06 Sep 2004 22:46:10 +0000 http://sepiamutiny.com?p=315#comment-587 <p><i>jim carrey did not use the pantomimed patter of his posterior to make a serious point about proctological protocols!</i></p> <p>what an adept, admirable application of alliteration. i must appreciate it with ardour. ;)</p> jim carrey did not use the pantomimed patter of his posterior to make a serious point about proctological protocols!

what an adept, admirable application of alliteration. i must appreciate it with ardour. ;)

]]>